LoMo: Local Modality Substitution for Deeper Vision-Language Fusion
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved substantial progress across a wide range of understanding and reasoning tasks, driven by large-scale image-text training aimed at multimodal fusion. Ideally, replacing a textual question with its rendered-image counterpart should leave model performance essentially unaffected. In practice, however, such modality substitution induces dramatic performance degradation. We attribute this "carrier sensitivity" issue to an inherent bias in current training corpora. Across prevalent datasets such as image captioning, VQA, OCR, and web-sourced interleaved data, text and images are typically organized into distinct and asymmetric roles, with text serving as linguistic queries and images as visual references. Such data bias leads VLMs to exhibit distinct preferences for information acquisition across different modalities. Consequently, VLMs fail to align representations of semantically equivalent content across textual and visual carriers, making model reasoning fragile under modality substitution. To address this, we propose Local Modality Substitution (LoMo), a lightweight, architecture-agnostic data curation paradigm designed to provide supervision for cross-modal representational invariance between semantically equivalent text and image carriers. LoMo achieves this by reformulating single-modality prompts into seamlessly interleaved multimodal sequences. It dynamically selects target text spans and recasts them as rendered images, thereby preserving the same semantics across "text, visual, text" carriers. Extensive experiments across 13 diverse multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that LoMo significantly improves overall multimodal reasoning and yields deeper cross-modal fusion. Specifically, it delivers consistent gains across foundational models, improving over standard SFT by 2.67 points on LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B and 2.82 points on Qwen3.5-9B.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 45 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
45 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Report26 Nov
- 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training28 Sep
- 2025MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following10 Apr
- 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Models18 Feb
- 2025ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Models13 Feb
- 2024Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate9 Oct
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs24 Jun
- 2024MANTIS: Interleaved Multi-Image Instruction Tuning2 May
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs11 Jan
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks21 Dec
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning5 Oct
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF25 Sep
2 more
Other references · 31
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,419
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 718
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 671
19 more
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 572
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
- 2023V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMscited by 459
- 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2022Pix2Struct: Screenshot Parsing as Pretraining for Visual Language Understandingcited by 360
- 2024We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?cited by 281
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 194
- 2024MMLongBench-Doc: Benchmarking Long-context Document Understanding with Visualizationscited by 174
- 2025DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts Optical Compressioncited by 174
- 2024Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 112
- 2024CC-OCR: A Comprehensive and Challenging OCR Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Literacycited by 80
- 2024Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 55
- 2025Glyph: Scaling Context Windows via Visual-Text Compressioncited by 49
- 2025Vision-centric Token Compression in Large Language Modelcited by 21
- 2024Leveraging Visual Tokens for Extended Text Contexts in Multi-Modal Learningcited by 17
- 2025Multilingual Pretraining for Pixel Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024Vision Model Pre-training on Interleaved Image-Text Data via Latent Compression Learningcited by 9
- 2025Text or Pixels? It Takes Half: On the Token Efficiency of Visual Text Inputs in Multimodal LLMscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs
- 2026Sparse Shortcuts: Facilitating Efficient Fusion in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Better Reasoning with Less Data: Enhancing VLMs Through Unified Modality Scoring
- 2024Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions
- 2026Measuring Cross-Modal Synergy: A Benchmark for VLM Explainability
- 2025SEAM: Semantically Equivalent Across Modalities Benchmark for Vision-Language Models
- 2025Rethinking the Text-Vision Reasoning Imbalance in MLLMs through the Lens of Training Recipes
- 2024MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models