mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Perturb Hidden Representations for Generalizable Deep Learning

arXiv 2605.29525 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks process data through a cascade of representations: input features, hidden activations, logits, and loss. While perturbations at the input, logit, and label levels have been systematically studied, the intermediate hidden activations, which constitute the bulk of the network's computation, have received no unified perturbation analysis. In this paper, we establish a unified framework for hidden activation perturbation, revealing that Dropout, Manifold Mixup, adversarial feature perturbation, and related methods all impose specific forms of activation perturbation but with class-agnostic or random strategies. We conjecture that expansive perturbation (increasing activation norm) acts as positive augmentation, while contractive perturbation (decreasing activation norm) acts as negative augmentation, and that the perturbation layer determines whether the effect resembles input-level augmentation (shallow layers) or logit-level manipulation (deep layers). We propose Learning to Perturb Activations (LPA), which adaptively perturbs activations at a selected hidden layer with class-level perturbations learned via PGD. We further provide theoretical analysis connecting activation perturbation to flat minima and perturbation amplification through layers. Experiments on balanced classification, long-tail classification, and domain generalization demonstrate that LPA consistently outperforms existing methods and provides complementary benefits to logit perturbation methods such as LPL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 25 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  7. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  8. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  9. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  10. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 618
  11. 2018Generalizing to Unseen Domains via Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 451
  12. 2018Generalizing Across Domains via Cross-Gradient Trainingcited by 268
6 more
  1. 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 262
  2. 2014Efficient Object Localization Using Convolutional Networkscited by 227
  3. 2021R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networkscited by 202
  4. 2019Implicit Semantic Data Augmentation for Deep Networkscited by 106
  5. 2017Shake-Shake regularizationcited by 87
  6. 2022Class-Level Logit Perturbationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.