Gradient Perturbation: Learning to Perturb Gradients for Adaptive Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural network training involves both forward propagation (from features through logits to loss) and backward propagation (from loss through gradients to parameter updates). While perturbations along the forward chain, including feature perturbation, logit perturbation, and label perturbation, have been extensively studied, the backward chain's gradient perturbation has received little systematic investigation. In this paper, we establish a unified framework for gradient perturbation, revealing that existing methods such as Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), gradient clipping, and gradient noise injection can all be interpreted as imposing specific forms of gradient perturbation. Analogous to the recently proposed Logit Perturbation Learning (LPL), we conjecture that amplifying the gradient norm for a class acts as positive augmentation (enhancing learning), while dampening it acts as negative augmentation (suppressing overfitting). Based on these observations, we propose Learning to Perturb Gradients (LPG), which adaptively perturbs logit-level gradients at the class level to achieve category-aware training. We also establish theoretical connections between gradient perturbation bounds and generalization guarantees via PAC-Bayesian analysis. Experiments on balanced classification, long-tail classification, and noisy label learning demonstrate that LPG consistently outperforms existing methods and can be combined with them as a plug-in module.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 30 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 809
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
13 more
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 618
- 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 535
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2020Long-tailed Recognition by Routing Diverse Distribution-Aware Expertscited by 271
- 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 251
- 2021Parametric Contrastive Learningcited by 217
- 2022Surrogate Gap Minimization Improves Sharpness-Aware Trainingcited by 172
- 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 145
- 2019Implicit Semantic Data Augmentation for Deep Networkscited by 106
- 2023Long-tailed Visual Recognition via Gaussian Clouded Logit Adjustmentcited by 75
- 2022Class-Level Logit Perturbationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.