mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computational Modeling of Antibody-Antigen Complexes: PLM-Based and MSA-Based Approaches

arXiv 2605.28886 ↗First posted 27 May 2026q-bio.QM cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Antibodies play a central role in the immune response by specifically recognizing and neutralizing antigens, and therapeutic antibodies have become major drugs for cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, their discovery still relies on extensive in vitro screening, and accurate computational modeling of antibody structures and antibody-antigen interactions can prioritize candidates, reduce experimental burden, and accelerate rational design. Despite recent advances in high-accuracy protein and complex prediction, a persistent performance gap remains for antibody-related tasks compared with general protein-protein interactions, limiting downstream design. This thesis investigates why antibody-related tasks are harder and proposes improvements along two complementary directions. First, we investigate protein language model (PLM)-based methods for antibody and antibody-antigen structure prediction. Using embeddings from multiple PLMs, our approach achieves the best CDR-H3 accuracy among compared PLM-based methods on antibody monomer prediction. Extending it to complex prediction does not generalize: without co-evolutionary signals between antibody and antigen, single-sequence PLM representations do not reliably identify binding interfaces. Second, we develop two MSA-based interventions for antibody-antigen complex prediction: MSA refinement, which combines CDR-focused filtering with depth recovery from a larger sequence database, and convergence-aware recycling, which selects a stable intermediate recycle state for final diffusion sampling. Together, these interventions provide consistent gains over the AlphaFold3 baseline on a held-out antibody-antigen test set. Because the methods modify MSA construction and recycling behavior rather than model parameters, they apply without retraining or weight access.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 148 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 148 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  4. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 848
  5. 2021Independent SE(3)-Equivariant Models for End-to-End Rigid Protein Dockingcited by 82
  6. 2021Deciphering antibody affinity maturation with language models and weakly supervised learningcited by 53
  7. 2023End-to-End Full-Atom Antibody Designcited by 49
  8. 2024SeqProFT: Sequence-only Protein Property Prediction with LoRA Finetuningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Antigen-specific Antibody Multi-modal Foundation Model for Functional Antibody Design
  2. 2025Antibody Design and Optimization with Multi-scale Equivariant Graph Diffusion Models for Accurate Complex Antigen Binding
  3. 2025dyAb: Flow Matching for Flexible Antibody Design with AlphaFold-driven Pre-binding Antigen
  4. 2025Guided Sequence-Structure Generative Modeling for Iterative Antibody Optimization
  5. 2025AbBiBench: A Benchmark for Antibody Binding Affinity Maturation and Design
  6. 2026EpiBench: Can LLMs Understand Epitopes for Antibody Drug Discovery?
  7. 2024Efficient Antibody Structure Refinement Using Energy-Guided SE(3) Flow Matching
  8. 2024Antigen-Specific Antibody Design via Direct Energy-based Preference Optimization