mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An End-to-End PyTorch Interface for Differentiable PDE Solvers: A RANS Model-Correction Study

arXiv 2605.28858 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CE cs.LG math-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work presents an end-to-end strategy for solving inverse problems constrained by Partial Differential Equations within a fully differentiable Machine Learning framework. The proposed formulation provides a unified and user-friendly methodology applicable to a wide range of problems, from data assimilation to closure modeling. Our approach combines a baseline differentiable PDE solver, which predicts the state w from the nonlinear system R(w) = 0, with a generic additive, parametrized, and differentiable correction fφ(w), with trainable parameters φ. We show how to optimize phi within a fully differentiable Python workflow by reformulating the PDE as an implicit layer, enabling its integration into arbitrary objective functions, while leveraging PyTorch's automatic differentiation graph. The method is demonstrated on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations for compressible flows, where the closure term, or a portion of it, is modeled using trainable parameters or a Neural Network. The first application considers the 2D NASA Wall-Mounted Hump test case, where a production-term parameter is optimized against time-averaged LES data. A second application is carried out on the VKI LS-59 turbine blade, where the Spalart-Allmaras eddy viscosity field is reconstructed through the optimization of a trainable spatial field. A dataset is generated starting from the VKI LS-59 turbine blade geometry using the differentiable BROADCAST solver with the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The results highlight the flexibility of the framework, showing its applicability beyond turbulence modeling to a broader class of physics-informed PDE-constrained problems with data-driven components.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

12 of 65 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  2. 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
  3. 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 514
  4. 2023MMGP: a Mesh Morphing Gaussian Process-based machine learning method for regression of physical problems under non-parameterized geometrical variabilitycited by 15
  5. 2025Towards scalable surrogate models based on Neural Fields for large scale aerodynamic simulationscited by 10
  6. 2017A Robust Multi-Batch L-BFGS Method for Machine Learningcited by 7
  7. 2021Universal Approximation Theorem for Neural Networkscited by 7
  8. 2024A data-driven learned discretization approach in finite volume schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and varying boundary conditionscited by 5
  9. 2023Volume-Preserving Transformers for Learning Time Series Data with Structurecited by 3
  10. 2024Mean flow data assimilation using physics-constrained Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
  11. 2021A Regularized Limited Memory BFGS method for Large-Scale Unconstrained Optimization and its Efficient Implementationscited by 2
  12. 2025Data-Driven Adaptive Gradient Recovery for Unstructured Finite Volume Computationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.