mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What are They Thinking? Delineation, Probing, and Tracking of Concepts in LLMs

arXiv 2605.28823 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

As the influence of LLMs expands, it is imperative to gain insight into their decisions. One way to do that is to develop probes that detect the presence or absence of a broad set of high-level abstract concepts within the embeddings computed in an LLM - which is what we might say a model is ``thinking" about. Such probes should be low-cost and easily applicable to any LLM, so that monitoring for many concepts is possible during normal operation. In this paper, we take the first steps towards developing the capability of creating many such probes by defining and executing examples of the key tasks needed: first, the careful delineation of a high-level abstract concept through the creation of a dataset with the concept both present and then absent. Then, the training and testing of a set of linear probes to detect the concept on any layer of an LLM, including an exploration of the complexity of the probe needed. Finally, we show that such probes can track concepts across larger contexts. This is done with four separate concepts and three different LLMs. When this process is scaled to many more concepts, it will create the ability to monitor new models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

Builds on

10 of 56 references.

References · 10

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  3. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  5. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  6. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  7. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
  8. 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 316
  9. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
  10. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Response Uncertainty and Probe Modeling: Two Sides of the Same Coin in LLM Interpretability?
  2. 2025Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs
  3. 2026Thinking Like a Scientist? A Structural Study of LLM-Generated Research Methods
  4. 2026How Do LLMs See Charts? A Comparative Study on High-Level Visualization Comprehension in Humans and LLMs ↗
  5. 2025Beyond Pattern Recognition: Probing Mental Representations of LMs
  6. 2025Analyzing Finetuning Representation Shift for Multimodal LLMs Steering
  7. 2025Beyond External Monitors: Enhancing Transparency of Large Language Models for Easier Monitoring
  8. 2025Can LLMs Help Uncover Insights about LLMs? A Large-Scale, Evolving Literature Analysis of Frontier LLMs