mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Expressive Power of Floating-Point Neural Networks with Arbitrary Reduction Orders and Inexact Activation Implementations

arXiv 2605.28704 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing expressivity theories for neural networks assume exact real arithmetic, whereas practical neural networks are executed under finite-precision floating-point arithmetic with implementation-dependent execution semantics. Recent works have begun studying the expressive power of floating-point neural networks, but existing results are limited to highly restricted activation functions and idealized assumptions such as fixed left-to-right reduction orders and correctly rounded activation implementations. In this work, we study the expressive power of floating-point neural networks under generalized floating-point execution semantics, including arbitrary reduction orders and inexact activation implementations with bounded ulp errors. We investigate when floating-point neural networks can represent arbitrary functions between floating-point domains exactly. To this end, we introduce a general distinguishability framework and show that the ability to distinguish every pair of distinct inputs in the first layer is necessary for universal representability. This characterization yields broad classes of activation implementations that are not universal representators, extending previous isolated counterexamples such as the correctly rounded cosine activation. We further prove that a suitable form of distinguishability is also sufficient for universal representability under mild conditions on the activation implementation. Using this framework, we establish universal representability results for a broad class of practical activation functions, including implementations of Sigmoid, tanh, ReLU, ELU, SeLU, GeLU, Swish, Mish, and sin, under significantly more realistic floating-point execution models than previously known.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  2. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
  3. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 664
  4. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
  5. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 406
  6. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 320
  7. 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 237
  8. 2019Universal Approximation with Deep Narrow Networkscited by 200
  9. 2022FP8 Formats for Deep Learningcited by 196
  10. 2018Universality of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
  11. 2020Minimum Width for Universal Approximationcited by 94
  12. 2021A comprehensive review of Binary Neural Networkcited by 45
5 more
  1. 2020Universal Approximation Power of Deep Residual Neural Networks via Nonlinear Control Theorycited by 18
  2. 2018On the Universal Approximability and Complexity Bounds of Quantized ReLU Neural Networkscited by 12
  3. 2022Approximation speed of quantized vs. unquantized ReLU neural networks and beyondcited by 8
  4. 2024Expressive Power of ReLU and Step Networks under Floating-Point Operationscited by 5
  5. 2024On Expressive Power of Quantized Neural Networks under Fixed-Point Arithmeticcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.