AOE: Exhaustive Out-of-Distribution Detection via Recalibrating Outlier Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for deploying machine learning models in open-world and safety-critical scenarios, where test inputs may deviate from the training distribution and overconfident predictions on unknown samples can lead to unreliable decisions. Outlier Exposure (OE) has emerged as a promising OOD detection paradigm by introducing auxiliary outliers during training to enlarge the margin between in-distribution (ID) and OOD samples. Existing OE-based methods typically enlarge this margin by employing uniform labels to maximize the entropy of OOD samples over ID categories. However, we theoretically show that uniform labels inevitably disregard the relations between OOD samples and ID categories, termed the over-softening effect, leading to a suboptimal margin bound. Our theoretical analysis further reveals that explicitly exploiting such relations can instead yield improved OOD detection performance. Motivated by this insight, we propose underlineAdaptive Confidence underlineOE (AOE), a simple yet effective method that leverages temperature scaling to recalibrate outlier labels. Specifically, AOE generates adaptive soft targets from temperature-scaled model predictions for OOD samples, where the learnable temperature smooths the prediction distribution without fully erasing class-wise relational information. By supervising OOD samples with these adaptive soft targets, AOE preserves the semantic proximity between OOD samples and ID categories while encouraging the softened targets to approach a high-entropy distribution, thereby suppressing overconfident OOD predictions and enlarging the separation margin. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of AOE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 20 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 405
- 2019DenseNet Models for Tiny ImageNet Classificationcited by 17
- 2023DOS: Diverse Outlier Sampling for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 16
- 2023Unleashing Mask: Explore the Intrinsic Out-of-Distribution Detection Capabilitycited by 16
- 2023How to Overcome Curse-of-Dimensionality for Out-of-Distribution Detection?cited by 15
- 2025T-CIL: Temperature Scaling using Adversarial Perturbation for Calibration in Class-Incremental Learningcited by 4
1 more
- 2024Generalizing GradCAM for Embedding Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.