Memory-Based vs. Context-Only Conditioning Produces Distinct Behavioral Patterns in Stateful Personalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study how conditioning context shapes personalization behavior in a teacher-facing educational recommender system. We compare contextual conditioning based on the current student question with memory-based conditioning using persistent learner information. Using deviation correlation and paired statistical tests, we find that contextual recommendations exhibit stronger question-level responsiveness, while memory-based recommendations exhibit history-dependent behaviors, including learner-specific differentiation under identical input. Teacher-facing evaluation signals suggest these recommendations are interpretable and actionable. These results indicate that embedding-based similarity metrics capture responsiveness to the current question but do not characterize personalization grounded in learner history, motivating behavior-level diagnostics for studying conditioning effects.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 634
- 2025Enabling Personalized Long-term Interactions in LLM-based Agents through Persistent Memory and User Profilescited by 17
- 2025A4L: An Architecture for AI-Augmented Learningcited by 4
- 2025Evolution of A4L: A Data Architecture for AI-Augmented Learningcited by 4
- 2026Evaluating Learner Representations for Differentiation Prior to Instructional Outcomescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.