mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FineVLA: Fine-Grained Instruction Alignment for Steerable Vision-Language-Action Policies

arXiv 2605.27284 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: Vision-language-action models → Generalist VLA models and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are increasingly expected to not only complete robot tasks, but also follow human instructions about how those tasks should be executed. However, existing robot datasets usually pair trajectories with coarse goal-level language, leaving execution-critical details such as active arm, approach direction, and contact region unspecified. This limits steerable policy learning and robotic video understanding. We introduce FineVLA, an open framework for action-aligned fine-grained VLA supervision. The framework includes: (1) a data construction tool that unifies 972,247 trajectories across 85K tasks from 10 open-source robot datasets and builds FineVLA-Data, a human-verified dataset of 47,159 fine-grained trajectories; (2) a held-out benchmark with 500 videos, 11,631 atomic facts, and 1,030 VQA questions; (3) a robotics-specialized VLM annotator for scalable fine-grained annotation; and (4) a steerable VLA policy trained with controlled mixtures of fine-grained and raw goal-level instructions. Our experiments yield three findings. First, fine-grained supervision does not sacrifice goal-level success: FG-only improves over Raw-only by +1.4 to +8.1 success-rate points across settings. Second, fine-grained and raw instructions are complementary, following a consistent inverted-U trend peaking at FG:Raw = 1:2 to 1:1. The best mixed setting reaches 86.8%/82.5% in RoboTwin simulation and 62.7/100 in real-world dual-arm manipulation (vs. 49.9 Raw-only). Third, fine-grained supervision improves steerable control: the largest real-world gains appear on pose (+23), color (+18), and approach direction (+18)--factors where goal-level instructions provide no guidance. Overall, fine-grained language should augment goal-level instructions: specifying how to execute alongside what to achieve. Project page: https://finevla.xlang.ai/

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Generalist VLA models and benchmarks, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026RoboInter: A Holistic Intermediate Representation Suite Towards Robotic Manipulation10 Feb
  2. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control31 Oct

Other references · 13

  1. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  2. 2024RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulationcited by 670
  3. 2023BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scalecited by 634
  4. 2023RH20T: A Comprehensive Robotic Dataset for Learning Diverse Skills in One-Shotcited by 173
  5. 2024RoboMIND: Benchmark on Multi-embodiment Intelligence Normative Data for Robot Manipulationcited by 166
  6. 2026π0.7: a Steerable Generalist Robotic Foundation Model with Emergent Capabilitiescited by 127
  7. 2025RoboTwin: Dual-Arm Robot Benchmark with Generative Digital Twinscited by 117
  8. 2022Robotic Skill Acquisition via Instruction Augmentation with Vision-Language Modelscited by 58
  9. 2025Robobench: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models as Embodied Braincited by 24
  10. 2024STEER: Flexible Robotic Manipulation via Dense Language Groundingcited by 13
  11. 2024Wolf: Dense Video Captioning with a World Summarization Frameworkcited by 7
  12. 2025PartInstruct: Part-level Instruction Following for Fine-grained Robot Manipulationcited by 4
1 more
  1. 2025HanDyVQA: A Video QA Benchmark for Fine-Grained Hand-Object Interaction Dynamicscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success
  2. 2026Generalizable VLA Finetuning via Representation Anchoring and Language-Action Alignment
  3. 2026Two Bridges, One Pathway: From VLMs to Generalizable VLAs with Embodied Trajectory-Coupled Data
  4. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model
  5. 2026Wall-OSS-0.5 Technical Report
  6. 2026Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering
  7. 2025Do What You Say: Steering Vision-Language-Action Models via Runtime Reasoning-Action Alignment Verification
  8. 2026KineVLA: Towards Kinematics-Aware Vision-Language-Action Models with Bi-Level Action Decomposition