The Need for an External Observer Formalizing the Sufficiency Gap: A Mathematical Extension of Mixture Identifiability and Contextual Grounding in Sequence Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We construct a binary mixed-regime process with one deterministic textual regime and one random regime governed by an unobserved latent state. Even an ideal infinite-capacity sequence predictor that exactly recovers the text-only marginal law can become overconfident when the observed prefix is compatible with the wrong latent regime. The resulting entropy difference is not an ordinary optimization error; it is a sufficiency gap caused by marginalization over an unobserved state. We then formalize retrieval, tool use, and external grounding through an auxiliary binary signal with fidelity γ ∈ [1/2,1]. The resulting Bayesian update yields a contextual dominance threshold: a corrective signal reverses the posterior odds induced by the textual history exactly when its fidelity exceeds the text-only posterior weight assigned to the misleading regime. This threshold reduces, but does not generally eliminate, the sufficiency gap; complete closure requires perfect revelation of the relevant latent state or an equivalent verification mechanism. The analysis clarifies why temperature scaling cannot restore missing context, why grounding mechanisms must be both informative and learnably usable by the model, and why autonomous sequence models require structurally decoupled observers or verifiers in high-stakes domains.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
5 more
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
- 2022MRKL Systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoningcited by 156
- 2026When Is Next-Token Prediction Useful? Marginalization, Ergodicity, Mixture Identifiability, Local Sufficiency, RAG, Tools, and Programmingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.