mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Managing Uncertainty in LLM-Generated Procedural Knowledge for Virtual Laboratory Planning

arXiv 2605.26333 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Educational virtual laboratories can make experimental training more scala-ble, adaptive, and accessible, especially when students have limited access to physical laboratory facilities. However, authoring new simulated laboratory procedures remains costly: educators must describe new equipment, define how instruments and materials interact, and specify valid procedural flows that can be executed or assessed inside the virtual environment. Large lan-guage models can assist in this authoring process by generating detailed ex-perimental procedures, but their output should not be treated as directly exe-cutable plans. They may omit necessary actions, arrange steps in the wrong order, or produce instructions that are logically incorrect or incompatible with the laboratory equipment. This paper presents a prototype framework for managing uncertainty in LLM-generated procedural knowledge for virtu-al laboratory planning. The framework aims to reduce procedural uncertainty by using structured domain representations and uncertain LLM-generated state-transition samples to extract candidate procedural rules, transform them into explicit and inspectable constraints, and use them to repair uncertain procedural steps. Although the motivating domain refers to educational vir-tual laboratories, the underlying problem is more general: managing uncer-tain procedural knowledge for action planning in structured interactive envi-ronments. We illustrate the approach in a virtual laboratory domain involving laboratory instruments, containers, tools, and material-transfer actions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

4 of 6 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  3. 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 372
  4. 2025A Neurosymbolic Approach to Natural Language Formalization and Verificationcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.