AutoDFT: A Closed-Loop Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous DFT Calculations
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Density functional theory (DFT) serves as the basis for computational discovery in materials science and chemistry, yet each calculation demands extensive human effort: adjusting algorithms when convergence stalls, revising plans when unexpected physics emerges, and inserting steps as intermediate results reshape the problem. Existing LLM-based agents automate only the initial planning stage, producing a full execution plan upfront and leaving all subsequent adaptation to hand-crafted rules. As a result, these workflows remain fragile, do not generalize well beyond pre-planned scenarios, and often require expert intervention when failures or unexpected intermediate results require changes to the calculation path. Here, we introduce AutoDFT, a closed-loop multi-agent framework that embeds LLM reasoning into every stage of the DFT lifecycle, where a strategic planner produces a skeletal plan of step objectives; a step planner generates numerical parameters just in time from preceding results; and a monitor-recover-reflect cycle diagnoses failures, repairs them, and revises the plan when the evidence justifies it. We demonstrate both breadth and depth: breadth on VASPBench, a purpose-built benchmark spanning 34 tasks and 9 DFT calculation types, where AutoDFT achieves 94.1% task-level success with GPT-5.2; and depth on established materials databases, where AutoDFT produces quantitatively reliable property predictions across electronic, magnetic, and energetic properties. By closing the loop between planning and execution, AutoDFT enables experimentalists without deep computational expertise to obtain reliable first-principles results.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
10 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 9
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 631
- 2015AiiDA: Automated Interactive Infrastructure and Database for Computational Sciencecited by 20
- 2024Mining experimental data from Materials Science literature with Large Language Models: an evaluation studycited by 11
- 2025Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physicscited by 11
- 2025Automated Machine Learning Pipeline: Large Language Models-Assisted Automated Dataset Generation for Training Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentialscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026TritonDFT: Automating DFT with a Multi-Agent Framework
- 2025GENIUS: An Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Design and Execution of Simulation Protocols
- 2026Evaluating a 4B open-weights local LLM for agentic DFT workflows: a literature reproducibility audit
- 2025Hierarchical Multi-agent Large Language Model Reasoning for Autonomous Functional Materials Discovery
- 2025VASP Agent: An Agentic Framework for Autonomous First-principles Calculations
- 2026An LLM agent for end-to-end computational materials discovery
- 2026Agentic programs: an emerging form of scientific software in computational materials science
- 2026An Agentic Orchestration of Atomistic Simulations