Conditional KRR: Injecting Unpenalized Features into Kernel Methods with Applications to Kernel Thresholding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conditionally positive definite (CPD) kernels are defined with respect to a function class F. It is well known that such a kernel K is associated with its native space (defined analogously to an RKHS), which in turn gives rise to a learning method -- called conditional kernel ridge regression (conditional KRR) due to its analogy with KRR -- where the estimated regression function is penalized by the square of its native space norm. This method is of interest because it can be viewed as classical linear regression, with features specified by F, followed by the application of standard KRR to the residual (unexplained) component of the target variable. Methods of this type have recently attracted increasing attention. We study the statistical properties of this method by reducing its behavior to that of KRR with another fixed kernel, called the residual kernel. Our main theoretical result shows that such a reduction is indeed possible, at the cost of an additional term in the expected test risk, bounded by O(1/√N), where N is the sample size and the hidden constant depends on the class F and the input distribution. This reduction enables us to analyze conditional KRR in the case where K is positive definite and F is given by the first k principal eigenfunctions in the Mercer decomposition of K. We also consider the setting where F consists of k random features from a random feature representation of K. It turns out that these two settings are closely related. Both our theoretical analysis and experiments confirm that conditional KRR outperforms standard KRR in these cases whenever the F-component of the regression function is more pronounced than the residual part.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 35 references.
References · 17
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 391
- 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
- 2021Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy Regimecited by 95
- 2022KERPLE: Kernelized Relative Positional Embedding for Length Extrapolationcited by 84
- 2017A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networkscited by 80
- 2020Implicit Regularization of Random Feature Modelscited by 54
- 2020Kernel Alignment Risk Estimator: Risk Prediction from Training Datacited by 54
- 2019Beyond Least-Squares: Fast Rates for Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization through Self-Concordancecited by 28
- 2019Eigenvalue distribution of nonlinear models of random matricescited by 27
5 more
- 2023ResMem: Learn what you can and memorize the restcited by 13
- 2024Operator World Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2022On the speed of uniform convergence in Mercer's theoremcited by 5
- 2024Multi-layer random features and the approximation power of neural networkscited by 2
- 2026On the Intrinsic Dimensions of Data in Kernel Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.