mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Far Has AI Come in Liver Fibrosis Staging? A Large-Scale Real-World Dataset and Benchmark

arXiv 2605.25595 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite years of methodological progress, how far AI has come in liver fibrosis staging has never been systematically evaluated under the heterogeneous, multi-center conditions that define clinical practice. To address this gap, we introduce LiFS, a large-scale dataset and benchmark derived from the MICCAI 2025 CARE-Liver challenge, comprising 610 patients across multiple centers and scanners with multi-sequence MRI. To the best of our knowledge, LiFS is the first benchmark providing complete gadoxetic acid-enhanced sequences with histopathology-confirmed annotations from diverse real-world scanners. Through systematic evaluation of 9 independently developed methods selected from 96 registered teams against in-cohort radiologist reference results, our findings address how far current AI has progressed toward clinical-level liver fibrosis staging from three complementary perspectives. First, against radiologists, the best AI methods were broadly comparable to the senior radiologist and significantly exceeded the junior radiologist in selected settings, while median AI performance generally approached junior-radiologist levels. Second, from a data perspective, cross-center heterogeneity, label imbalance, and contrast-enhanced sequence variability emerge as the dominant challenges for AI methods. Third, from a technical perspective, methodological design choices, including spatial registration, input dimensionality, multi-modal fusion strategy, and backbone architecture, appear to modulate cross-center robustness, although no single choice alone closes the gap. Overall, LiFS provides a rigorous real-world benchmark for positioning the current state of AI in liver fibrosis staging and for enabling future research on the key challenges that limit clinically reliable deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 37 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentationcited by 307
  4. 2022UniFormer: Unifying Convolution and Self-attention for Visual Recognitioncited by 206
  5. 2024Learning General-Purpose Biomedical Volume Representations using Randomized Synthesiscited by 27
  6. 2023A Reliable and Interpretable Framework of Multi-view Learning for Liver Fibrosis Stagingcited by 13
  7. 2024MERIT: Multi-view evidential learning for reliable and interpretable liver fibrosis stagingcited by 12
  8. 2024Large Scale MRI Collection and Segmentation of Cirrhotic Livercited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.