mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ATWL: A Formal Language for Representing, Comparing, and Reusing Visual Analytics Workflows

arXiv 2605.25489 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual analytics (VA) workflows are inherently complex, involving data transformation, feature engineering, visual representation, and human interpretation. They are typically described in unstructured prose, hindering systematic comparison, reuse of proven strategies, and training of novices. We present Artifact-Transform Workflow Language (ATWL), a domain-agnostic, declarative language that formally represents VA workflows by capturing their structure and underlying analytical intent. ATWL is built upon a modular ontology of eight artifact types (entities, features, arrangements, visualisations, patterns, models, knowledge, specifications) and transforms characterised by standardised intents (e.g., define-unit, characterise, contextualise, abstract). To show that formalisation effort need not impede adoption, we extract workflows from research papers through supervised interaction with LLM agents, reducing the human role to review and refinement. Using this process, we constructed a library of seventeen ATWL workflows from published VA papers. Cross-workflow analysis reveals structural regularities -- a recurrent meta-structure, recurring motifs, reusable building blocks, diverse iterative strategies, and cross-domain equivalences -- that remain invisible in prose. We further evaluate practical utility through a controlled experiment in which the same LLM addressed two analytical problems with the library supplied either as original papers or as ATWL representations. Both forms enabled useful recommendations, but the formal representation systematically added explicit iteration structure, typed data flow, fragment-level adaptation provenance, and compactness supporting scaling beyond what prose libraries can fit in an LLM's context. ATWL enables a transition from narrative descriptions to formally represented, comparable, and reusable analytical knowledge.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

4 of 50 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  2. 2017A Workflow for Visual Diagnostics of Binary Classifiers using Instance-Level Explanationscited by 20
  3. 2018A User-based Visual Analytics Workflow for Exploratory Model Analysiscited by 12
  4. 2015What May Visualization Processes Optimize?cited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025StarFlow: Generating Structured Workflow Outputs From Sketch Images
  2. 2026InsightChain: Optimized Chain-of-Insight Analytics for LLM-driven Data Visualization
  3. 2026Chat2Workflow: A Benchmark for Generating Executable Visual Workflows with Natural Language
  4. 2025Urbanite: A Dataflow-Based Framework for Human-AI Interactive Alignment in Urban Visual Analytics
  5. 2026TopoPilot: Reliable Conversational Workflow Automation for Topological Data Analysis and Visualization
  6. 2025A2P-Vis: an Analyzer-to-Presenter Agentic Pipeline for Visual Insights Generation and Reporting
  7. 2024Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows?
  8. 2024LightVA: Lightweight Visual Analytics with LLM Agent-Based Task Planning and Execution