mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intent Signal Theory: A Computational Framework for Intent-State Control in Human-AI Interaction

arXiv 2605.25058 ↗First posted 24 May 2026cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current AI interaction models treat the prompt as the primary object of exchange, omitting a critical layer: the user's latent source intent, the goal state preceding and motivating the prompt. Here we introduce Intent Signal Theory (IST), a computational framework that formalises this missing intent layer. IST distinguishes four objects routinely conflated: latent source intent (I*), observable intent proxy (I-hat), encoded carrier (P), and model output (O). It formalises dimensional weights, encoding masks, structural and fidelity recovery scores, and public-private intent decomposition. The Theorem of Irreversible Intent Loss establishes that private intent absent from the carrier cannot be recovered beyond generic substitution. Evidence from four companion studies spanning six LLMs, three languages and three task domains shows structural-fidelity splits, human-validated metric dissociation, and weight-tolerance plateaus consistent with IST's predictions. IST reframes prompt engineering as intent-protocol design and identifies a computational layer that current AI systems lack.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 26 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  6. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  7. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  8. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  9. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  10. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  11. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
  12. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
6 more
  1. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 332
  2. 2021AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Promptscited by 268
  3. 2026Evaluating 5W3H Structured Prompting for Intent Alignment in Human-AI Interactioncited by 4
  4. 2026Does Structured Intent Representation Generalize? A Cross-Language, Cross-Model Empirical Study of 5W3H Promptingcited by 3
  5. 2026Structured Intent as a Protocol-Like Communication Layer: Cross-Model Robustness, Framework Comparison, and the Weak-Model Compensation Effectcited by 2
  6. 2026Dimension-Level Intent Fidelity Evaluation for Large Language Models: Evidence from Structured Prompt Ablationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.