mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Muon in Vision Transformers: Optimizer-Recipe Interactions and Gradient Spectra

arXiv 2605.24770 ↗First posted 23 May 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Muon is a recently developed matrix-aware optimizer that has shown strong results in transformer training, but its behavior in vision transformers (ViTs) is not yet well understood. We study Muon for ViT training, largely on ImageNet-100 and Pl@ntNet-300K, comparing against AdamW under standard vision recipes involving mixup, cutmix, smoothing, and random augmentation and erasing. Muon consistently outperforms AdamW, with especially large gains on long-tailed Pl@ntNet macro top-1. These gains are also recipe-dependent, where Muon benefits much more than AdamW from advanced and significant data augmentation techniques. To understand this interaction, we analyze the singular-value structure of matrix gradients throughout the ViT. Within Muon training runs, removing heavy data augmentation induces a late-training spectral concentration and mode collapse in gradient matrices, primarily in deep MLP-down blocks. Under a fixed "full" augmentation recipe, the clearest Muon-AdamW contrast appears instead in QKV gradients, where AdamW gradient energy remains concentrated in a much narrower basis while Muon spreads energy across substantially more singular modes. Muon in ViTs is therefore best understood as an optimizer-recipe interaction. Under a fixed recipe, Muon differs from AdamW most clearly in attention projections, where its gradients consist of a broader spectral basis. Within Muon, a full training recipe is important for preventing late spectral concentration and mode collapse in deep feedforward blocks. We further demonstrate efficacy in training ViTs on image segmentation and masked autoencoder models, where Muon outperforms AdamW in all settings considered.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2026.

Builds on

31 of 39 references.

References · 31

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  7. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  8. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  9. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  11. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  12. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
19 more
  1. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
  2. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  3. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  4. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  5. 2022data2vec: A General Framework for Self-supervised Learning in Speech, Vision and Languagecited by 727
  6. 2021LoveDA: A Remote Sensing Land-Cover Dataset for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 261
  7. 2015Optimal whitening and decorrelationcited by 97
  8. 2025Muon Optimizes Under Spectral Norm Constraintscited by 86
  9. 2025Gluon: Making Muon & Scion Great Again! (Bridging Theory and Practice of LMO-based Optimizers for LLMs)cited by 72
  10. 2025PolarGrad: A Class of Matrix-Gradient Optimizers from a Unifying Preconditioning Perspectivecited by 52
  11. 2025Muon Outperforms Adam in Tail-End Associative Memory Learningcited by 46
  12. 2026Convergence of Muon with Newton-Schulzcited by 36
  13. 2026To Use or not to Use Muon: How Simplicity Bias in Optimizers Matterscited by 10
  14. 2024SpecFormer: Guarding Vision Transformer Robustness via Maximum Singular Value Penalizationcited by 5
  15. 2025FastPose-ViT: A Vision Transformer for Real-Time Spacecraft Pose Estimationcited by 4
  16. 2026Beyond Muon: MUD (MomentUm Decorrelation) for Faster Transformer Trainingcited by 4
  17. 2025Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategycited by 3
  18. 2025Muon-Accelerated Attention Distillation for Real-Time Edge Synthesis via Optimized Latent Diffusioncited by 2
  19. 2026SVD-ViT: Does SVD Make Vision Transformers Attend More to the Foreground?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.