mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Normalized Maximum Likelihood for Regular Non-Smooth Models: Measure-Theoretic Foundations and Geometric Sampling

arXiv 2605.24477 ↗First posted 23 May 2026cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Normalized Maximum Likelihood (NML) codelength, or stochastic complexity, represents a principled criterion for universal coding. While recent coarea-based formulations provided a calculation method for smooth models, this framework collapses for the non-smooth estimators ubiquitous in modern machine learning (e.g., Lasso, Sparse SVMs). In this work, we provide a rigorous framework for computing the NML for regular path-differentiable Lipschitz (PDL) estimators. By applying classical geometric measure theory and bridging the coarea formula with conservative Jacobians, we prove that the stochastic complexity for non-smooth models is well-posed and theoretically consistent with the outputs of modern Automatic Differentiation. To compute this quantity exactly, we introduce the Propose-and-Project Metropolis-Hastings (PDL-PPMH) sampler, a geometric MCMC algorithm capable of traversing the non-differentiable level sets of the maximum likelihood estimator. We theoretically justify its components, including a stochastic tangent space proposal and a provably convergent non-smooth projection solver. We demonstrate the method's robustness by sampling from a high-dimensional Lasso posterior (P=2000), while simultaneously quantifying the computational scaling that governs the trade-off between exactness and mixing time. Crucially, we empirically demonstrate that our exact NML criterion provides a highly data-efficient alternative to cross-validation, achieving statistically indistinguishable predictive optima without requiring data splitting. Altogether, our work paves the way for the theoretical analysis of the NML codelength for regular non-smooth models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 43 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019Conservative set valued fields, automatic differentiation, stochastic gradient method and deep learningcited by 71
  2. 2020Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Goodcited by 49
  3. 2020A mathematical model for automatic differentiation in machine learningcited by 44
  4. 2019Minimum Description Length Revisitedcited by 36
  5. 2025Symmetry in Neural Network Parameter Spacescited by 31
  6. 2018Gradient Sampling Methods for Nonsmooth Optimizationcited by 23
  7. 2021A survey of Monte Carlo methods for noisy and costly densities with application to reinforcement learning and ABCcited by 8
  8. 2022On the complexity of nonsmooth automatic differentiationcited by 4
  9. 2023Learning Capacity: A Measure of the Effective Dimensionality of a Modelcited by 4
  10. 2024Foundation of Calculating Normalized Maximum Likelihood for Continuous Probability Modelscited by 3
  11. 2026On randomized step sizes in Metropolis-Hastings algorithmscited by 2
  12. 2023A projected semismooth Newton method for a class of nonconvex composite programs with strong prox-regularitycited by 1
3 more
  1. 2025Gradient sampling algorithm for subsmooth functionscited by 1
  2. 2025Normalized Maximum Likelihood Code-Length on Riemannian Data Spacescited by 1
  3. 2026Evidence Slopes and Effective Dimension in Singular Linear Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.