mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multimodal Alignment and Preference Optimization for Zero-Shot Conditional RNA Generation

arXiv 2605.23961 ↗First posted 12 May 2026q-bio.BM cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Preference optimization for molecular design

Abstract (arXiv)

The design of RNA molecules that interact with specific proteins is a critical challenge in experimental and computational biology. Despite recent progress in natural language modeling and deep learning-based protein design, there remains significant room to improve the frequency of successful interactions and the authenticity of generated sequences for functional applications. In this work, we frame conditional RNA sequence generation as a multi-stage alignment problem, introducing Moirain: a suite of models optimized via multimodal supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Our approach begins with large-scale pretraining on diverse RNA corpora to capture the fundamental grammars of sequence plausibility. To achieve target-specific generation, we employ a multimodal SFT architecture that conditions RNA synthesis on protein structural and sequential features. Finally, we leverage DPO to refine the model using synthetic interaction data: taking advantage of DPO's unique ability to navigate non-aligned preference spaces, we improve functional fitness without collapsing the learned natural distribution. Extensive evaluation of the Moirain series (Moirain-Base, -Multi, and -DPO) demonstrates that our framework consistently produces novel, diverse, and biologically plausible RNA sequences with superior binding affinities compared to existing baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Preference optimization for molecular design, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 84 references.

References · 28

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  8. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  9. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  10. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  12. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
16 more
  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  2. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  6. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  7. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
  8. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
  9. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 503
  10. 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
  11. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 328
  12. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 241
  13. 2024Unintentional Unalignment: Likelihood Displacement in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 67
  14. 2024RNAFlow: RNA Structure & Sequence Design via Inverse Folding-Based Flow Matchingcited by 12
  15. 2026Diversity in Large Language Models under Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 4
  16. 2025BAnG: Bidirectional Anchored Generation for Conditional RNA Designcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Designing RNAs with Language Models
  2. 2024RNACG: A Universal RNA Sequence Conditional Generation model based on Flow-Matching
  3. 2026RNA Design via Conditioned Flow Matching and Finite-Policy Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Protein-Conditioned Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Full-Length mRNA Design
  5. 2026mRNAutilus: Multi-Objective-Guided Discrete Generation of mRNA with Optimized Therapeutic Properties
  6. 2025Self Distillation Fine-Tuning of Protein Language Models Improves Versatility in Protein Design
  7. 2025g-DPO: Scalable Preference Optimization for Protein Language Models
  8. 2026MORAD: Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Objective Rewards for RNA Inverse Design