Calibration-Informative Region Selection for Online LiDAR--Camera Calibration in Agricultural Environments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable multi-modal calibration requires identifying which observations truly constrain the extrinsic parameters and which ones mainly add noise or ambiguity. In this paper, we propose a support-map-driven approach to multi-modal calibration that decouples four functional blocks: initial calibration, cross-modal residual extraction, support-map estimation, and support-aware refinement. We instantiate this formulation for online LiDAR--camera calibration using MDPCalib, a target-less LiDAR--camera calibration method based on motion and deep point correspondences, and CMRNext, a dense LiDAR--camera matching model that predicts optical-flow-like image-plane residuals. The key contribution is a dense calibration support map that aggregates cross-modal agreement over aligned observations and highlights where calibration evidence is consistently reliable. Across the Bacchus Long-Term (BLT) dataset and KITTI, we show that calibration evidence is spatially and semantically non-uniform, indicating that some semantic regions provide stronger cues for calibration than others. On KITTI, support-guided refinement improves the calibration performance with better translation accuracy while rotational gains remain limited.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
3 of 6 references.
References · 3
- 2024CMRNext: Camera to LiDAR Matching in the Wild for Localization and Extrinsic Calibrationcited by 15
- 2024Automatic Target-Less Camera-LiDAR Calibration From Motion and Deep Point Correspondencescited by 6
- 2025Keypoint Semantic Integration for Improved Feature Matching in Outdoor Agricultural Environmentscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.