mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CHASD: Language Increment-Calibrated Contrastive Decoding against Hallucination in LVLMs

arXiv 2605.23344 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Hallucination detection and mitigation

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Vision-Language Models have shown strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, yet they remain susceptible to object hallucinations when language priors dominate insufficient or misaligned visual evidence. Training-free contrastive decoding methods mitigate this issue by comparing predictions from original and perturbed visual inputs, but existing approaches either apply global perturbations that may alter useful visual evidence or invoke an additional negative branch at every decoding step. In this paper, we observe that hallucination risks are transient and token-specific: visual attention shifts across generated tokens, while some functional tokens are produced with high confidence and do not require contrastive calibration. Based on this observation, we propose Contrastive Hallucination-Aware Step-wise Decoding (CHASD) for Large Vision-Language Models, an inference-time framework for "calibration on demand". CHASD uses an uncertainty-driven confidence gate to activate the contrastive branch only when the maximum probability of the next-token is less than the threshold, and constructs the negative branch through attention-guided localized perturbations of the currently salient visual tokens. This design reduces unnecessary negative-branch forward passes while preserving the original distribution for high-confidence steps. Experiments on POPE, AMBER, MME, MMHal-Bench, and CHAIR show that CHASD improves hallucination-related metrics over strong training-free baselines with competitive inference efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination detection and mitigation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 41 references.

References · 8

  1. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  2. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  3. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  4. 2023Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magiccited by 906
  5. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 300
  6. 2024Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 29
  7. 2024VACoDe: Visual Augmented Contrastive Decodingcited by 8
  8. 2026SDCD: Structure-Disrupted Contrastive Decoding for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding
  2. 2024Delve into Visual Contrastive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation of Large Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding
  4. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Internal Fact-based Contrastive Decoding
  5. 2025ONLY: One-Layer Intervention Sufficiently Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Efficient Contrastive Decoding with Probabilistic Hallucination Detection - Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models -
  7. 2025Grounding Language with Vision: A Conditional Mutual Information Calibrated Decoding Strategy for Reducing Hallucinations in LVLMs
  8. 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding