When Determinants Are Not Enough: Private Rare Switching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this note, I would like to share a small research moment where Codex helped me find the right way to adapt rare switching to the private setting. The standard determinant-based update rule in linear bandits and RL works beautifully because the design matrix grows monotonically. But once Gaussian noise is added for privacy, this monotonicity can fail, and the usual analysis no longer goes through. The key reason is that determinant growth controls volume, while regret analysis needs control of the worst direction. To address this, Codex comes up with a different rare-switching rule based on the generalized Rayleigh quotient, which restores logarithmic policy updates and the desired confidence-width comparison up to a constant factor. I present my manually clean-up version of the proof here as well as some personal reflection on this example.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
3 of 4 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.