Understanding Data Temporality Impact on Large Language Models Pre-training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained on shuffled corpora, yielding models whose knowledge is frozen at train time and whose temporal grounding remains poorly understood. In this work, we study the impact of pre-training dynamics on the acquisition of time-sensitive factual knowledge, focusing specifically on data ordering. Our main contributions are twofold. First, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark of over 7,000 temporally grounded questions and an evaluation protocol that enables analysis of whether models correctly associate facts with their corresponding time periods. Second, we pretrain 6B-parameter models on temporally ordered Common Crawl snapshots and compare them against standard shuffled pre-training. Our results show that sequentially trained models match shuffled baselines on general language understanding and common knowledge while consistently exhibiting more up-to-date and temporally precise knowledge. Temporally ordered pre-training yields improved factual freshness, while shuffled pre-training peaks on older data, possibly due to increased factual repetition. These findings, along with the release of our code at https://github.com/kyutai-labs/kairos , checkpoints, and datasets at https://huggingface.co/collections/kyutai/kairos provide a foundation for future research on continual learning for LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 23 references.
References · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2024OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluationscited by 106
- 2024Does your data spark joy? Performance gains from domain upsampling at the end of trainingcited by 52
- 2025How do language models learn facts? Dynamics, curricula and hallucinationscited by 37
- 2024Maximize Your Data's Potential: Enhancing LLM Accuracy with Two-Phase Pretrainingcited by 26
- 2024Set the Clock: Temporal Alignment of Pretrained Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025BeyondWeb: Lessons from Scaling Synthetic Data for Trillion-scale Pretrainingcited by 21
- 2025Data Mixing Can Induce Phase Transitions in Knowledge Acquisitioncited by 16
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.