Relational Linear Properties in Language Models: An Empirical Investigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Linear properties are ubiquitous in the representations of language models; however, testing them experimentally remains a challenging task. This work focuses on relational linearity: the hypothesis that, for a fixed relation (e.g., "plays"), the unembedding of an object (e.g., "trumpet") can be predicted from the embedding of its subject (e.g.,"Miles Davis") by a linear map. We present an experimental method to test the formulation of relational linearity by Marconato et al. (2025). Specifically, we introduce a probing method, based on Kullback-Leibler divergence, to evaluate this property and examine its variation across layers and paraphrased relational queries. It is also more efficient than previous work; for example, it avoids the crude Jacobian approximations used in Linear Relational Embeddings by Hernandez et al. (2024). Our findings across four datasets show that relational linearity varies across models, exhibits layer-wise patterns consistent with prior observations about linguistic information in model representations, and is differently affected by changes in how the relation is phrased.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
27 of 39 references.
References · 27
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 199
- 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 190
- 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 186
15 more
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 173
- 2023Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Modelscited by 140
- 2021Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Colorcited by 118
- 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 103
- 2023Language Models Implement Simple Word2Vec-style Vector Arithmeticcited by 97
- 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 83
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Modelscited by 73
- 2024Emergence of a High-Dimensional Abstraction Phase in Language Transformerscited by 56
- 2024Interpreting Key Mechanisms of Factual Recall in Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 30
- 2024All or None: Identifiable Linear Properties of Next-token Predictors in Language Modelingcited by 14
- 2025The CLEF-2025 CheckThat! Lab: Subjectivity, Fact-Checking, Claim Normalization, and Retrievalcited by 14
- 2023Identifying Linear Relational Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2026Linear Representations of Hierarchical Concepts in Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024Locating and Extracting Relational Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Tracing Relational Knowledge Recall in Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.