mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Implicit Regularization of Mini-Batch Training in Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2605.22480 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Mini-batch training of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is fundamentally different from training on i.i.d. data: sampling a subgraph alters the topology and introduces boundary effects, leading prior work to develop structure-aware samplers that preserve local connectivity and reduce embedding variance. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that the simplest possible scheme, Random Node Sampling (RNS), training on the induced subgraph of uniformly sampled nodes, matches or outperforms full-graph training on 8 of 10 datasets at a fraction of the wall-clock time and memory. To explain this, we apply backward error analysis to graph mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and show that it implicitly minimizes the sampled loss plus a regularizer proportional to the mini-batch gradient variance, a quantity directly shaped by the sampler. Although RNS discards local structure, it produces mini-batches whose expected loss is closer to the full-graph loss, and whose per-batch gradients have lower variance, yielding a better implicit objective. Our analysis reframes the choice of graph sampler as a form of implicit regularization, and identifies RNS as a strong, theoretically grounded method for scalable GNN training.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

24 of 31 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  5. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  6. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,133
  7. 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 583
  8. 2019Cluster-GCN: An Efficient Algorithm for Training Deep and Large Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 540
  9. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
  10. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
  11. 2023NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 207
  12. 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 183
12 more
  1. 2019Layer-Dependent Importance Sampling for Training Deep and Large Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 177
  2. 2020Implicit Gradient Regularizationcited by 145
  3. 2017A Bayesian Perspective on Generalization and Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 134
  4. 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 131
  5. 2017Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networkscited by 108
  6. 2024Classic GNNs are Strong Baselines: Reassessing GNNs for Node Classificationcited by 83
  7. 2024Polynormer: Polynomial-Expressive Graph Transformer in Linear Timecited by 64
  8. 2025PyG 2.0: Scalable Learning on Real World Graphscited by 49
  9. 2023Implicit regularization in Heavy-ball momentum accelerated stochastic gradient descentcited by 25
  10. 2023On the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 25
  11. 2024GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Datacited by 20
  12. 2022Layer-Neighbor Sampling -- Defusing Neighborhood Explosion in GNNscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.