mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PhylaFlow: Hybrid Flow Matching in Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann Tree Space for Phylogenetic Inference

arXiv 2605.21859 ↗First posted 21 May 2026q-bio.PE cs.LG q-bio.QMcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Phylogenetic trees are hybrid objects: branch lengths vary continuously, while topologies change discretely through edge contractions and expansions. Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann (BHV) tree space provides a canonical geometry for this structure, representing each resolved topology as a Euclidean orthant and topological changes as motion across shared lower-dimensional boundaries. We introduce PhylaFlow, a hybrid flow-matching model that learns posterior-basin transport in BHV tree space. PhylaFlow is trained on BHV geodesic paths from random starting trees to short-run posterior samples, coupling continuous branch-length motion within orthants with learned boundary events and discrete topology transitions. We evaluate the learned geometry operationally: if the flow reaches posterior-relevant regions, finite-budget Bayesian refinement initialized from, or guided by, its terminal trees should recover posterior-supported topologies more efficiently. Across DS1-DS8 phylogenetic posterior benchmarks, PhylaFlow substantially reduces initial Tree-KL relative to classical initializers. After finite-budget MrBayes refinement, direct PhylaFlow improves early and intermediate topology-recovery trajectories on most datasets, while split-guided PhylaFlow-MCMC obtains the strongest hard-case results. The best PhylaFlow variant outperforms short-warmup on seven of eight datasets and PhyloGFN on five of eight under the same refinement budget. In a joint sequence-conditioned experiment, sequence embeddings steer posterior split recovery, although exact posterior topology recovery remains preliminary. These results show that hybrid flow matching can learn actionable transport in BHV tree space and provide a geometry-aware proposal mechanism for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct

Other references · 7

  1. 2022Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learnerscited by 188
  2. 2020Improved Variational Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 17
  3. 2023GeoPhy: Differentiable Phylogenetic Inference via Geometric Gradients of Tree Topologiescited by 9
  4. 2023ARTree: A Deep Autoregressive Model for Phylogenetic Inferencecited by 4
  5. 2024PhyloGen: Language Model-Enhanced Phylogenetic Inference via Graph Structure Generationcited by 1
  6. 2025PhyloVAE: Unsupervised Learning of Phylogenetic Trees via Variational Autoencoderscited by 1
  7. 2025Brownian motion, bridges and Bayesian inference in phylogenetic tree spacecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Branching Flows: Discrete, Continuous, and Manifold Flow Matching with Splits and Deletions
  2. 2024Hierarchical Conditioning of Diffusion Models Using Tree-of-Life for Studying Species Evolution
  3. 2024Categorical Flow Matching on Statistical Manifolds
  4. 2026Categorical Flow Maps
  5. 2026PhyloSDF: Phylogenetically-Conditioned Neural Generation of 3D Skull Morphology via Residual Flow Matching
  6. 2024Fisher Flow Matching for Generative Modeling over Discrete Data
  7. 2026Flow Matching is Adaptive to Manifold Structures
  8. 2026What Topological and Geometric Structure Do Biological Foundation Models Learn? Evidence from 141 Hypotheses