AgForce Enables Antigen-conditioned Generative Antibody Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Antibody design methods condition on antigen structure to generate complementarity-determining regions (CDR), yet a systematic evaluation of baseline methods reveals that they largely ignore the antigen input. We identify three failure modes that explain this behavior. Antigen blindness arises because models derive predictions from antibody framework context rather than antigen information, producing nearly identical CDRs regardless of the target. Vocabulary collapse reduces predicted amino acids to three to five per position, far below the ground truth distribution in native sequences. The argmax bottleneck on the cross-entropy loss via greedy decoding acts as a null predictor that sees only position and loop length and recovers almost all the residues irrespective of the model architecture and the target antigen. We propose a novel encoder-decoder architecture called AgForce that uses a graph neural network (GNN) as the encoder and specialized decoders for sequence-structure co-design. Specifically, we apply framework dropout, gated bottlenecks, and hyperbolic cross attention that prevent the antibody shortcut path. In the decoder, a Mixture Density Network (MDN) sequence head with Potts-like pairwise coupling and annealed Multiple Choice Learning (aMCL) replaces the cross-entropy objective with a multi-component distribution. An antigen cycle consistency head routes gradients through the sequence decoder, forcing predicted distributions to encode antigen identity. On the ChiMERa-Bench dataset, AgForce leads the baselines on every interface metric on all three splits (fnat, iRMSD, DockQ, and epitope F1) together with structure and sequence, while achieving roughly a 2x larger effective vocabulary compared to the GNN baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
References · 18
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 965
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 684
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
- 2021Iterative Refinement Graph Neural Network for Antibody Sequence-Structure Co-designcited by 86
- 2022Conditional Antibody Design as 3D Equivariant Graph Translationcited by 75
- 2023End-to-End Full-Atom Antibody Designcited by 49
- 2018GDPP: Learning Diverse Generations Using Determinantal Point Processcited by 26
- 2023AbODE: Ab Initio Antibody Design using Conjoined ODEscited by 15
- 2024VN-EGNN: E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks with Virtual Nodes Enhance Protein Binding Site Identificationcited by 15
- 2024Annealed Multiple Choice Learning: Overcoming limitations of Winner-takes-all with annealingcited by 12
6 more
- 2025dyAb: Flow Matching for Flexible Antibody Design with AlphaFold-driven Pre-binding Antigencited by 10
- 2024Retrieval Augmented Diffusion Model for Structure-informed Antibody Design and Optimizationcited by 9
- 2025Antibody Design and Optimization with Multi-scale Equivariant Graph Diffusion Models for Accurate Complex Antigen Bindingcited by 9
- 2024Relation-Aware Equivariant Graph Networks for Epitope-Unknown Antibody Design and Specificity Optimizationcited by 8
- 2025AbFlowNet: Optimizing Antibody-Antigen Binding Energy via Diffusion-GFlowNet Fusioncited by 4
- 2026CHIMERA-Bench: A Benchmark Dataset for Epitope-Specific Antibody Designcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.