mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Task-Agnostic Algebraic Integrity Metric for Event-Camera Streams Toward SOTIF-Compliant Perception using Pearson Correlation Coefficient

arXiv 2605.21500 ↗First posted 8 May 2026eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Event cameras have emerged as a high-bandwidth, low-latency sensing modality for safety-critical perception in automated driving systems (ADS), offering microsecond temporal resolution, 120-140 dB dynamic range, and intrinsic absence of motion blur. However, no task-agnostic quality metric currently operates directly on the asynchronous event stream: state-of-the-art proxies require a downstream task (e.g., detection accuracy, tracking error) to assess stream integrity, which is incompatible with the certification requirements of ISO 21448 (SOTIF) and ISO/PAS 8800:2024. The recent BiasBench benchmark (CVPR 2025) explicitly identifies this gap. This work proposes a unified algebraic framework that lifts the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC), historically used in two prior works for redundancy filtering and ROI selection on frame-based images, to the three standard event representations: Time Surface, Event Frame, and Voxel Grid. The framework yields three metrics: (i) r-TS for stream integrity monitoring against an ego-motion-predicted Time Surface, (ii) r2-EF for adaptive ROI selection requiring only integer comparisons, and (iii) r-VG for temporal redundancy gating. A structural isomorphism is established between the contrast-threshold mechanism of the event camera (|Delta L| >= C) and the PCC-based change criterion, the three lifted metrics are formalized, and pipeline latency and information loss are analyzed symmetrically against the raw stream. Illustrative behavior of each metric is demonstrated on a procedural-synthetic event stream, generated by direct simulation of the emission model rather than drawn from any real or video-derived dataset, including a tunnel-dip integrity-anomaly scenario in which r_C drops from 0.93 (coherent flow) to below 0 (alarm). An explicit epistemic convention ([ESTABLISHED], [SOLID], [HYPOTH.], [OPEN]) delineates the status of every contribution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2019Event-based Vision: A Surveycited by 1,016
  4. 2021DSEC: A Stereo Event Camera Dataset for Driving Scenarioscited by 303
  5. 2018HATS: Histograms of Averaged Time Surfaces for Robust Event-based Object Classificationcited by 218
  6. 2020A Large Scale Event-based Detection Dataset for Automotivecited by 109
  7. 2019Focus Is All You Need: Loss Functions For Event-based Visioncited by 83
  8. 2024Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Reviewcited by 53
  9. 2024Event-based Stereo Depth Estimation: A Surveycited by 19
  10. 2024Spiking Neural Network as Adaptive Event Stream Slicercited by 8
  11. 2023SAFE: Saliency-Aware Counterfactual Explanations for DNN-based Automated Driving Systemscited by 5
  12. 2025Hardware, Algorithms, and Applications of the Neuromorphic Vision Sensor: a Reviewcited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025Decomposition and Quantification of SOTIF Requirements for Perception Systems of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 2
  2. 2025BiasBench: A reproducible benchmark for tuning the biases of event camerascited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.