Automated Byzantine-Resilient Clustered Decentralized Federated Learning for Battery Intelligence in Connected EVs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for managing electric vehicle (EV) battery data in intelligent transportation systems (ITS), enabling privacy-preserving tasks such as anomaly detection and capacity estimation. However, most existing frameworks rely on centralized aggregation schemes, which pose critical limitations in terms of security and trust. To address these challenges, we propose ABC-DFL, an automated Byzantine-resilient clustered decentralized federated learning (C-DFL) framework for connected EVs. The proposed incentive-driven C-DFL system replaces the central server with an open-permissioned blockchain, featuring a new dynamic Quorum Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT) protocol and an oracle-based aggregation layer, to enhance trust, security, and automation. At the core of ABC-DFL lies FLECA (Filtered Layered Enhanced Clustering Aggregation), a robust hierarchical aggregation protocol that mitigates Byzantine attacks by having each EV filter malicious updates using an adaptive threshold based on deviations from its reference model update. Oracle nodes, responsible for inter-group aggregation, employ robust clustering to isolate and aggregate model updates from trustworthy EV groups. Comprehensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that FLECA matches FedProx convergence under benign conditions and significantly outperforms existing defenses with attack impact scores below 0.10 in adaptive adversarial scenarios. Furthermore, several learning experiments with multitask models confirm the effectiveness and fairness of the incentive mechanism. Finally, on-chain and off-chain benchmarks validate the practicality of ABC-DFL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 50 references.
References · 19
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 312
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 250
- 2021Feature Importance-aware Transferable Adversarial Attackscited by 125
- 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
- 2022Neurotoxin: Durable Backdoors in Federated Learningcited by 97
- 2023Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 97
- 2023Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 86
- 2020Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 28
7 more
- 2023BayBFed: Bayesian Backdoor Defense for Federated Learningcited by 23
- 2023Source Inference Attacks: Beyond Membership Inference Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 10
- 2024A Survey on Federated Learning in Intelligent Transportation Systemscited by 9
- 2024Zero-X: A Blockchain-Enabled Open-Set Federated Learning Framework for Zero-Day Attack Detection in IoVcited by 7
- 2022EVBattery: A Large-Scale Electric Vehicle Dataset for Battery Health and Capacity Estimationcited by 4
- 2025VerifBFL: Leveraging zk-SNARKs for A Verifiable Blockchained Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2025AutoDFL: A Scalable and Automated Reputation-Aware Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.