Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Fake Image Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing sophistication of GAN-based image manipulation presents significant challenges for digital forensics. This study compares the performance of four pretrained CNN architectures including VGG16, ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, and XceptionNet for fake image detection using a unified preprocessing and training pipeline. A dataset of real and manipulated images was processed through resizing, normalization, and augmentation to address class imbalance and improve generalization. Models were evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy at 91%, with XceptionNet, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB0 each reaching 90%. EfficientNetB0 showed stronger sensitivity to fake images but reduced reliability on real samples, reflecting imbalance-driven bias. Limitations include dataset imbalance, overfitting, and limited interpretability, which affect cross-domain robustness. The study provides a reproducible baseline and underscores the need for balanced datasets, advanced augmentation, and fairness-aware training to develop reliable fake image detection systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
6 of 18 references.
References · 6
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2020Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overviewcited by 209
- 2020DeepFake Detection by Analyzing Convolutional Tracescited by 81
Built on by
Not cited yet.