mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GenAI-Driven Threat Detection with Microsoft Security Copilot

arXiv 2605.20896 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Defending against today's increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks requires security analysts to continuously translate evolving attacker tradecraft into detection logic. This places defenders in a reactive posture, requiring constantly updated expertise across an increasingly fragmented security landscape. We introduce the Dynamic Threat Detection Agent (DTDA), an always-on adaptive agent that continuously investigates security incidents across Microsoft Defender to uncover hidden threats and generate explainable detections when attack-story gaps are found. DTDA combines: (1) a unified activity timeline spanning alerts, events, user and entity behavior analytics, and threat intelligence; (2) versioned LLM prompt contracts with schema validation, grounding requirements, bounded retries, and fail-closed suppression; (3) a planner-executor investigation loop that generates attack-specific hypotheses and gathers supporting and refuting evidence; and (4) dynamic alert generation with a context-relevant title, severity, MITRE mappings, remediation guidance, implicated entities, and natural-language attack description. Integrated into Microsoft Security Copilot and deployed across tens of thousands of Defender customers, DTDA operates continuously at industry scale. In a 120-day online evaluation, DTDA achieves 80.1% precision from customer feedback while generating novel alerts for approximately 15% of investigated incidents. In offline evaluation, DTDA recovers hidden malicious activity with 0.78 F1 using GPT-5.4, improving over GPT-4.1 by 0.12 F1 and outperforming the baseline by 0.26 F1 points. Operationally, DTDA processes single-incident investigations end-to-end in a median of 28 minutes at a median token cost of USD 2.04, with a 0.38% job-level failure rate. These results demonstrate that autonomous agents can identify missed malicious activity at a production scale.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

9 of 37 references.

References · 9

  1. 2025CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scalecited by 71
  2. 2020UNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threatscited by 53
  3. 2018HOLMES: Real-time APT Detection through Correlation of Suspicious Information Flowscited by 43
  4. 2019POIROT: Aligning Attack Behavior with Kernel Audit Records for Cyber Threat Huntingcited by 27
  5. 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypescited by 19
  6. 2025CORTEX: Collaborative LLM Agents for High-Stakes Alert Triagecited by 14
  7. 2024AI-Driven Guided Response for Security Operation Centers with Microsoft Copilot for Securitycited by 7
  8. 2024GraphWeaver: Billion-Scale Cybersecurity Incident Correlationcited by 3
  9. 2026Towards Agentic Investigation of Security Alertscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.