Causal Machine Learning Is Not a Panacea: A Roadmap for Observational Causal Inference in Health
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objective: The growing availability of large-scale observational clinical datasets and challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials have spurred enthusiasm in using causal machine learning (ML) for causal inference in observational data. We present a roadmap for applying causal ML to observational data. Materials and methods: We outline the importance of assessing validity assumptions within available data and applying causal ML responsibly for clinical experts using causal ML and ML practitioners with limited clinical expertise. Observations: Despite advances in causal ML, its limitations remain largely under-appreciated across disciplines. This gap in shared knowledge may impact the validity of findings. Discussion: Causal assumptions must be satisfied and modeling choices justified. Otherwise, these approaches risk producing biased or misleading results, with consequences for clinical research and patient care. Conclusion: Causal ML can be a powerful tool for generating causal hypotheses. We provide a template to strengthen the rigor and interpretability of causal analyses.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
7 of 39 references.
References · 7
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 332
- 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
- 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 151
- 2024Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomescited by 74
- 2020Sense and Sensitivity Analysis: Simple Post-Hoc Analysis of Bias Due to Unobserved Confoundingcited by 25
Built on by
Not cited yet.