SURF: Steering the Scalarization Weight to Uniformly Traverse the Pareto Front
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scalarization is widely used in multi-objective optimization owing to its simplicity and scalability. In many applications, the goal is to generate solutions that represent diverse user preferences, ideally with uniform coverage of the Pareto front (PF). However, uniformly sampling scalarization weights usually induces non-uniform coverage of the PF. We explain this mismatch through the geometry of the scalarization path. As the weight varies, the corresponding solutions traverse the PF at a generally nonuniform speed. Integrating this speed gives cumulative arc length. After normalization by the total length, it defines a cumulative distribution function (CDF) on weights whose inverse selects points at equal arc-length intervals. Building on this insight, we propose SURF (Sampling Uniformly along the Pareto Front). For structured problems, including bi-objective bandits, we derive analytical expressions for this CDF map and the resulting PF-aware weight sampling rule. For general problems, SURF alternates between CDF reconstruction and weight sampling. Theoretically, we show that under provable conditions for bi-objective LS, SURF's CDF reconstruction error converges linearly to an O(N-2) discretization floor. Empirically, experiments on bandits, multi-objective-gymnasium, and multi-objective LLM alignment demonstrate that SURF efficiently achieves more uniform PF coverage than baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 115 references.
References · 16
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
- 2024Smooth Tchebycheff Scalarization for Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 54
- 2025PARM: Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment via Preference-Aware Autoregressive Reward Modelcited by 28
- 2022Pareto Conditioned Networkscited by 25
- 2025Gradient-Based Multi-Objective Deep Learning: Algorithms, Theories, Applications, and Beyondcited by 18
- 2024Traversing Pareto Optimal Policies: Provably Efficient Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2024Pareto Merging: Multi-Objective Optimization for Preference-Aware Model Mergingcited by 14
- 2025Multi-objective Large Language Model Alignment with Hierarchical Expertscited by 13
- 2025Projection Optimization: A General Framework for Multi-Objective and Multi-Group RLHFcited by 11
4 more
- 2024Policy-regularized Offline Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2024Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedbackcited by 10
- 2023Optimization on Pareto sets: On a theory of multi-objective optimizationcited by 7
- 2025Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewardscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ParetoTransport: Generative Optimization by Mass Transport Toward The Pareto Front
- 2026ParetoPilot: Zero-Surrogate Offline Multi-Objective Optimization via Infer-Perturb-Guide Diffusion
- 2024ParetoFlow: Guided Flows in Multi-Objective Optimization
- 2026Pareto-Conditioned Diffusion Models for Offline Multi-Objective Optimization
- 2025SPREAD: Sampling-based Pareto front Refinement via Efficient Adaptive Diffusion
- 2025Preference-Guided Diffusion for Multi-Objective Offline Optimization
- 2026Learning Where to Steer: Noise-Space Geometry for Efficient Offline Multi-Objective Optimization with Generative Models
- 2026Global Convergence of Sampling-Based Nonconvex Optimization through Diffusion-Style Smoothing