mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Economics of AI Inference: Inflation Dynamics, Welfare Costs, and Optimal Monetary Policy under the Inference-Cost Phillips Curve

arXiv 2605.20281 ↗First posted 19 May 2026econ.GN cs.LG q-fin.ECcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a unified microeconomic and monetary theory of artificial intelligence inference costs and their pass-through to inflation, welfare, and optimal monetary policy. We introduce the Inference-Cost Phillips Curve (ICPC), an augmented New Keynesian Phillips curve in which firm-level marginal costs of producing differentiated goods include a non-trivial AI inference component lambda-bar, and prove a closed-form structural slope kappa*_inf = lambda-bar * kappa, where kappa is the standard Calvo-Yun slope. We derive a welfare-relevant Hicks-Kaldor decomposition of consumer welfare under inference-cost shocks, prove a generalized Taylor principle for the inference-augmented economy, and characterize the optimal monetary policy response coefficient psi*_inf = (1 + phi*rho) * lambda-bar * kappa under commitment. A second-order welfare loss formula closes the model in closed form. We confront the theory with U.S. monthly data 2022:M01-2026:M04 using a two-step GMM estimator with Newey-West HAC standard errors and Hansen J-test, recovering an empirical slope kappa-hat_inf = 0.087 (HAC s.e. 0.021) which lies within one standard error of the structural prediction. A scaling regression over 50 rolling-window subwindows yields b-hat = 0.987 (R^2 = 0.998), consistent with a near-unit-elasticity pass-through. A G7 reduced-form panel with Driscoll-Kraay HAC standard errors yields b-hat^G7 = 0.094 (s.e. 0.026), and a Wald test fails to reject cross-country homogeneity (p = 0.78). The framework provides a single equilibrium scaffold for the joint study of AI inference cost dynamics, monetary policy under generative-AI shocks, and the welfare cost of inference-driven inflation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 41 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  3. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  4. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
  5. 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 161

Built on by

Not cited yet.