mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Data Scaling as Progressive Coverage of a Predictive Contribution Spectrum

arXiv 2605.20196 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the hypothesis that real-data scaling laws are governed by progressive coverage of a latent predictive contribution spectrum rather than by token-frequency tails alone. We work with a suffix-automaton representation of text corpora and define a data-intrinsic global-KL predictive contribution spectrum, in which each state contributes according to its empirical mass times its KL deviation from a global next-token baseline. Across 12 real corpora, the tail slope of this spectrum is already strongly correlated with the empirical data-scaling exponent of a fixed small GPT learner. We then go beyond slope correlation and define, for each training size N, an effective truncation rank K(N) by matching the observed excess loss to the residual tail mass of the prepared 1000k global-KL spectrum. Empirically, log K is close to linear in log N, with pooled R^2 about 0.96 for the raw spectrum and R^2 about 0.90 for the smoothed spectrum. These findings provide strong empirical support for a simple mechanism picture: training scale advances an effective frontier through a predictive state spectrum, and the residual tail mass of that spectrum tracks the remaining excess loss.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.

Builds on

3 of 6 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,494
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,972
  3. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 355

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.