mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Distillation Guarantees under Algorithmic Alignment for Combinatorial Optimization

arXiv 2605.20074 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distillation transfers knowledge from a large model trained on broad data to a smaller, more efficient model suitable for deployment. In structured prediction settings, prior knowledge about the task can guide the choice of a target architecture that is algorithmically aligned with the underlying problem. Building on recent learning-theoretic analyses of decision-tree (DT) distillation (Boix-Adsera, 2024), we study when distillation succeeds for combinatorial optimization tasks. We focus on the case where the target model is a graph neural network whose architecture is aligned with a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm for the task. Assuming that the source model is sufficiently rich, formalized through the linear representation hypothesis (LRH) (Elhage et al., 2022; Park et al., 2024), we show that the distillation problem can be solved efficiently in the complexity parameters of the DP transition function, represented as a DT. Our results provide a rigorous sufficient condition for successful distillation in the flavour of algorithmic alignment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  4. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  5. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  6. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,167
  7. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  8. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  9. 2019Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 318
  10. 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 171
  11. 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 159
  12. 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 149
13 more
  1. 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 147
  2. 2022Graph Neural Networks are Dynamic Programmerscited by 55
  3. 2024Does equivariance matter at scale?cited by 52
  4. 2023Scaling MLPs: A Tale of Inductive Biascited by 37
  5. 2021Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel Methodscited by 30
  6. 2023The Exact Sample Complexity Gain from Invariances for Kernel Regressioncited by 28
  7. 2021On the Sample Complexity of Learning under Invariance and Geometric Stabilitycited by 13
  8. 2023Asynchronous Algorithmic Alignment with Cocyclescited by 13
  9. 2024On the hardness of learning under symmetriescited by 13
  10. 2025Graph neural networks extrapolate out-of-distribution for shortest pathscited by 11
  11. 2025Primal-Dual Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 9
  12. 2023NN-Steiner: A Mixed Neural-algorithmic Approach for the Rectilinear Steiner Minimum Tree Problemcited by 6
  13. 2016Distribution Free Learning with Local Queriescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.