mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Worst-Group Equalized Odds Regularization for Multi-Attribute Fair Medical Image Classification

arXiv 2605.19214 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Diagnostic performance in medical AI varies systematically across demographic groups, yet subgroup AUC can mask clinically important disparities. At a fixed inference-time operating point, some groups may exhibit over-diagnostic behaviour, characterized by elevated true and false positive rates, while others show under-diagnostic patterns with reduced true and false positive rates. These opposing tendencies can cancel in aggregate AUCs while producing meaningful inequities in clinical decision-making. Motivated by the need to assess and mitigate such disparities at the operating point and across multiple demographic attributes simultaneously, we propose a worst-group equalized-odds margin regularizer. The proposed regularizer explicitly targets subgroup-level deviations on both the true positive and false positive sides at inference. At each update, the method identifies subgroups defined by explicit demographic attributes (e.g., age, sex, and race) that exhibit the most extreme margin deviations and applies a unified penalty, enabling fairness optimization across multiple demographic axes without requiring explicit intersectional constraints. Across two medical imaging datasets in realistic multi-label settings, our method consistently reduces disparities in Equalized Odds and Equalized Opportunity with minimal impact on AUC, preserving diagnostic performance while improving fairness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  5. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  6. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  7. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  8. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  9. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  10. 2018Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Predictioncited by 77
  11. 2023Harvard Glaucoma Fairness: A Retinal Nerve Disease Dataset for Fairness Learning and Fair Identity Normalizationcited by 31
  12. 2022Addressing Fairness Issues in Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Reviewcited by 28
4 more
  1. 2022FairDisCo: Fairer AI in Dermatology via Disentanglement Contrastive Learningcited by 22
  2. 2023On Fairness of Medical Image Classification with Multiple Sensitive Attributes via Learning Orthogonal Representationscited by 17
  3. 2025Incorporating Rather Than Eliminating: Achieving Fairness for Skin Disease Diagnosis Through Group-Specific Expertcited by 5
  4. 2024FairREAD: Re-fusing Demographic Attributes after Disentanglement for Fair Medical Image Classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.