Supporting System Testing with a Multi-Agent LLM-based Framework for Knowledge Graph Extraction: A Case Study with Ethernet Switch Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Technical documents contain rich domain knowledge for automating downstream tasks such as system testing. While this paper focuses on Ethernet switch configuration manuals (ESCMs), we propose a general framework that can be adapted to different industrial contexts. ESCMs provide valuable domain knowledge for Ethernet switch testing, but their semi-structured format, implicit step attributes, and complex section dependencies make them difficult to directly leverage for test automation. To address this, we generate knowledge graphs (KGs) that capture configuration knowledge from ESCM in a structured form. We propose a multi-agent LLM-based framework that extracts, evaluates, and improves KGs from ESCMs using a fine-grained KG schema and an iterative Extract-Evaluate-Improve (EEI) loop. Our evaluation on 50 real-world ESCMs shows that our framework achieves high extraction correctness using the original prompts, with average correctness scores ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 across three extraction tasks. For challenging ESCMs, the EEI loop further improves correctness through manual-specific prompt refinement. Moreover, the LLM judgments and human evaluations show substantial agreement, with Cohen's kappa of at least 0.72 across all extraction tasks. Finally, feedback from industry testers indicates that the generated KGs can support the generation of useful and correct test case specifications (TCSs) for downstream testing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,103
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 621
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 367
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
- 2024Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreementcited by 105
- 2023Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 71
4 more
- 2024Extract, Define, Canonicalize: An LLM-based Framework for Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 70
- 2022Generative Knowledge Graph Construction: A Reviewcited by 49
- 2025Requirements-Based Test Generation: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 4
- 2025Generating High-Level Test Cases from Requirements using LLM: An Industry Studycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026CircuitLM: A Multi-Agent LLM-Aided Design Framework for Generating Circuit Schematics from Natural Language Prompts
- 2025Fault2Flow: An AlphaEvolve-Optimized Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent System for Fault-to-Workflow Automation
- 2025Automated Network Protocol Testing with LLM Agents
- 2025ChipMind: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Long-Context Circuit Design Specifications
- 2025Guided Reasoning in LLM-Driven Penetration Testing Using Structured Attack Trees
- 2026A Survey on LLM-Integrated Hardware Design Verification
- 2026LIDL: LLM Integration Defect Localization via Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Multi-Agent Analysis
- 2024GeNet: A Multimodal LLM-Based Co-Pilot for Network Topology and Configuration