PROTEA: Offline Evaluation and Iterative Refinement for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent LLM workflows -- systems composed of multiple role-specific LLM calls -- often outperform single-prompt baselines, but they remain difficult to debug and refine. Failures can originate from subtle errors in intermediate outputs that propagate to downstream nodes, requiring developers to inspect long traces and infer which agent to modify. We present PROTEA, a unified interface for offline, test-driven improvement of multi-agent workflows. PROTEA executes a workflow, scores intermediate node outputs with configurable rubrics, and overlays per-node states and rationales on the workflow graph to localize likely bottlenecks. To support complex systems where final-answer references are the primary supervision, PROTEA performs backward node evaluation: it generates candidate node-level expectations from final-answer references and graph context, then compares them with observed node outputs. For selected nodes, PROTEA presents targeted prompt revisions as editable before/after comparisons, then automatically reruns and re-evaluates the workflow to show output changes and score trajectories within the same interface. In two production-adjacent workflows, PROTEA improved document-inspection accuracy from 64.3% to 83.9% and recommendation Hit@5 from 0.30 to 0.38. In a formative study with six experienced LLM developers, participants valued graph-level localization, per-node rationales, and editable before/after prompt revisions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
8 of 17 references.
References · 8
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
- 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 259
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Do More Agents Help? Controlled and Protocol-Aligned Evaluation of LLM Agent Workflows
- 2026Rethinking the Value of Multi-Agent Workflow: A Strong Single Agent Baseline
- 2026From Static Templates to Dynamic Runtime Graphs: A Survey of Workflow Optimization for LLM Agents
- 2026ProgRouter: Online Progress-Guided Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows under Quality-Cost Tradeoffs
- 2024Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation
- 2026CURATE: Leveraging LLM Agents to Compose, Catalog, and Deploy Reproducible Workflows
- 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents
- 2026WorkflowPerturb: Calibrated Stress Tests for Evaluating Multi-Agent Workflow Metrics