Adaptive Generate-Rank-Verify: Inference-Time Search with Costly Verification
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Many inference-time language-model pipelines combine a cheap reward signal with an expensive verifier, such as exact answer checking in mathematical reasoning or hidden-test execution in code generation. We formalize this setting using a learning-theoretic lens as generative active search: a cost-sensitive first-positive search problem in which a policy adaptively samples candidates from an unknown distribution, observes cheap scores, and pays for verifier labels until it finds a positive example. For a fixed prompt, the generator and reward model induce two unknown objects: a distribution over reward scores and a score-conditioned success function. When these quantities are known, we characterize the distribution-aware optimal policy using a dynamic programming approach. In the realistic and practical setting where both the score distribution and success function are unknown, we propose ADAP, a shellwise adaptive generate-rank-verify algorithm that progressively increases the number of sampled responses and top-ranked verifications. Under the monotonicity assumption that higher reward scores are no less likely to pass verification, we show that ADAP achieves expected cost within a constant factor of the distribution-aware optimum. We complement this result with learning-theoretic lower bounds, based on a centered star number, showing that structural assumptions on the score--label relationship are necessary. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and competitive programming validate the predicted advantage over both fixed non-adaptive policies and difficulty-adaptive baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.
Builds on
28 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation for Reasoning LLMs via Constrained Policy Optimization16 Apr
- 2026Verify to Amplify: Improving Reasoning via Learned Chain-of-Thought Verification3 Mar
- 2026When to Trust the Cheap Check: Weak and Strong Verification for Reasoning19 Feb
- 2026Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation via Learned Heuristics over Categorical Structure3 Feb
- 2025Taming Imperfect Process Verifiers: A Sampling Perspective on Backtracking3 Oct
- 2024Learning How Hard to Think: Input-Adaptive Allocation of LM Computation7 Oct
- 2024Derailer-Rerailer: Adaptive Verification for Efficient and Reliable Language Model Reasoning25 Aug
Other references · 21
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2022CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Testscited by 369
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 267
- 2023LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Executioncited by 228
9 more
- 2025Process Reward Models That Thinkcited by 118
- 2025Is Best-of-N the Best of Them? Coverage, Scaling, and Optimality in Inference-Time Alignmentcited by 91
- 2014Minimax Analysis of Active Learningcited by 61
- 2025Dynamic Scaling of Unit Tests for Code Reward Modelingcited by 31
- 2025AdaBoN: Adaptive Best-of-N Alignmentcited by 8
- 2026Optimal Bayesian Stopping for Efficient Inference of Consistent LLM Answerscited by 7
- 2025On Learning Verifiers and Implications to Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 6
- 2025Optimal Stopping vs Best-of-N for Inference Time Optimizationcited by 6
- 2025BEACON: Bayesian Optimal Stopping for Efficient LLM Samplingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning via Reward-Guided Dual-Phase Search
- 2026PaT: Planning-after-Trial for Efficient Test-Time Code Generation
- 2026Automating Formal Verification with Reinforcement Learning and Recursive Inference
- 2025Reward Model Generalization for Compute-Aware Test-Time Reasoning
- 2026V1: Unifying Generation and Self-Verification for Parallel Reasoners
- 2026HSRM: Hidden-State Reward Models for Test-Time Verification
- 2026What If We Allocate Test-Time Compute Adaptively?
- 2026Goedel-Code-Prover: Hierarchical Proof Search for Open State-of-the-Art Code Verification