CyberCorrect: A Cybernetic Framework for Closed-Loop Self-Correction in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) self-correction -- the ability to detect and fix errors in generated outputs -- remains largely ad hoc, relying on generic prompts such as "please reconsider your answer" without systematic error analysis or convergence guarantees. We propose CyberCorrect, a framework that formalizes LLM self-correction as a closed-loop control system grounded in cybernetic theory. The framework models the LLM generator as the plant and introduces a tri-modal Error Detector (combining self-consistency, verbalized confidence, and logic-chain verification) as the sensor. A type-directed Correction Controller generates targeted repair instructions based on diagnosed error categories, while a Convergence Judge determines iteration termination using stability criteria adapted from control theory. We further introduce three control-theoretic evaluation metrics -- convergence rate, overshoot rate, and oscillation rate -- that capture correction dynamics beyond final accuracy. Experiments on our constructed CyberCorrect-Bench (440 reasoning tasks with annotated error types and correction paths) show that CyberCorrect achieves 79.8% final accuracy, improving upon the best existing self-correction method by 6.2 percentage points, while reducing overshoot (erroneous over-correction) by 41% through its convergence control mechanism.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.
Builds on
12 of 18 references.
References · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 324
- 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 277
- 2023REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representationscited by 205
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies
- 2024Large Language Models have Intrinsic Self-Correction Ability
- 2025Self-Correction Bench: Uncovering and Addressing the Self-Correction Blind Spot in Large Language Models
- 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Learning to Check: Unleashing Potentials for Self-Correction in Large Language Models
- 2024Small Language Model Can Self-correct
- 2025Language Models can perform Single-Utterance Self-Correction of Perturbed Reasoning
- 2026Safe Error Correction for Language Models: Frozen-Base Adjustment with Capability Preservation