mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Calibeating for general proper losses: A Bregman divergence approach

arXiv 2605.17269 ↗First posted 17 May 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work introduces a general framework for calibeating based on regret minimization. As compared to Foster and Hart's seminal calibeating work which had specialized treatments of Brier score (squared loss) and log loss, we consider a large family of proper losses that includes α-Tsallis losses (for α ∈ [1, 2]) and Lipschitz losses. Our results for Tsallis losses also hold for an unscaled version of Tsallis loss that recovers log loss. Our analysis is oriented around the Bregman divergence view of a proper loss. Technically, our results for the family of Tsallis losses that we consider are U-calibration results, simultaneously obtaining logarithmic regret for all losses in this family while having a weaker dependence on the dimension compared to previous results. Of potential independent interest, we also show a new regret equality for the regret of Be The Regularized Leader. This regret equality holds for general proper losses and itself is based on two results related to online updating formulas for the generalized variance, the latter being a previously introduced generalization of variance based on Bregman divergences.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 31 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
  2. 2022"Calibeating": Beating Forecasters at Their Own Gamecited by 14
  3. 2024Optimal Multiclass U-Calibration Error and Beyondcited by 13
  4. 2015The fundamental nature of the log loss functioncited by 10
  5. 2023Online Platt Scaling with Calibeatingcited by 8
  6. 2025A Generalized Bias-Variance Decomposition for Bregman Divergencescited by 8
  7. 2026Calibeating Made Simplecited by 5
  8. 2021Robust confidence distributions from proper scoring rulescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.