MixSD: Mixed Contextual Self-Distillation for Knowledge Injection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is widely used to inject new knowledge into language models, but it often degrades pretrained capabilities such as reasoning and general-domain performance. We argue this forgetting arises because fine-tuning targets from humans or external systems diverge from the model's autoregressive distribution, forcing the optimizer to imitate low-probability token sequences. To address this problem, we propose MixSD, a simple external-teacher-free method for distribution-aligned knowledge injection. Instead of training on fixed targets, MixSD constructs supervision dynamically by mixing tokens from two conditionals of the base model itself: an expert conditional that observes the injected fact in context, and a naive conditional that reflects the model's original prior. The resulting supervision sequences preserve the factual learning signal while remaining substantially closer to the base model's distribution. We evaluate MixSD on two synthetic corpora that we construct to study factual recall and arithmetic function acquisition in a controlled setting, together with established benchmarks for open-domain factual question answering and knowledge editing. Across multiple model scales and settings, MixSD consistently achieves a better memorization-retention trade-off compared to SFT and on-policy self distillation baselines, retaining up to 100% of the base model's held-out capability while maintaining near-perfect training accuracy, whereas standard SFT retains as little as 1%. We further show that MixSD produces substantially lower-NLL supervision targets under the base model and reduces harmful movement along Fisher-sensitive parameter directions. These results suggest that aligning supervision with the model's native generation distribution is a simple and effective principle for knowledge injection that mitigates catastrophic forgetting.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2026.
Builds on
38 of 40 references.
References · 38
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
26 more
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
- 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
- 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 548
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
- 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
- 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 345
- 2023MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questionscited by 292
- 2023Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 238
- 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMscited by 175
- 2026On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Modelscited by 161
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Modelscited by 157
- 2024Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Self-Synthesized Rehearsalcited by 114
- 2023EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 97
- 2024Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 92
- 2026Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?cited by 87
- 2026Self-Distillation Zero: Self-Revision Turns Binary Rewards into Dense Supervisioncited by 58
- 2024Injecting New Knowledge into Large Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 56
- 2024Scaling Laws for Forgetting When Fine-Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024Efficient Knowledge Injection in LLMs via Self-Distillationcited by 22
- 2024More Than Catastrophic Forgetting: Integrating General Capabilities For Domain-Specific LLMscited by 21
- 2023DUnE: Dataset for Unified Editingcited by 19
- 2025PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluationcited by 14
- 2025Toward Honest Language Models for Deductive Reasoningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.