mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Language Acquisition Device in Large Language Models

arXiv 2605.16758 ↗First posted 16 May 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain substantially less data-efficient than humans. Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic languages has been proposed to close this gap, with prior work emphasizing highly expressive formal languages such as k-Shuffle Dyck. Inspired by the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) hypothesis, which posits that innate constraints preemptively restrict the learner's hypothesis space to natural-language-like structure, we propose LAD-inspired PPT: pre-pretraining on MP-STRUCT, a formal language whose strings encode hierarchical composition, feature-based dependencies, and long-distance displacement via MERGE, AGREE, and MOVE. A brief 500-step PPT with MP-STRUCT matches strong formal-language baselines in token efficiency while additionally imparting a human-like resistance to structurally implausible languages (e.g., REVERSE). Analyzing simplified variants, we find that MP-STRUCT CORE outperforms k-Shuffle Dyck despite not being definable in C-RASP (a formal bound on transformer expressivity), challenging the prior hypothesis that effective PPT languages must be both hierarchically expressive and circuit-theoretically learnable. We show that functional landmarks, which reduce dependency resolution ambiguity, are a key driver, suggesting that effective PPT design depends not only on expressivity but also on the accessibility of dependency resolution.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2026.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  4. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 503
  5. 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
  6. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 406
  7. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
  8. 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 88
  9. 2024Counting Like Transformers: Compiling Temporal Counting Logic Into Softmax Transformerscited by 39
  10. 2025Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biasescited by 37
  11. 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 35
  12. 2022Pretraining with Artificial Language: Studying Transferable Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.