GRASP: Graph Agentic Search over Propositions for Multi-hop Question Answering
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic retrieval improves multi-hop question answering by giving language models autonomy to iteratively gather evidence. Recent work augments these systems with knowledge graphs for structured traversal, but this combination introduces significant cost: expensive graph construction at index time and compounding token usage at inference time. We introduce Graph Agentic Search over Propositions (GRASP), an agentic system that simultaneously optimizes for high accuracy and minimal token usage in multi-hop question answering. Rather than executing a rigid, singular query, GRASP actively coordinates its retrieval strategy by decomposing multi-hop queries into dependency-aware plans. This enables GRASP to dynamically scale the number of sub-agents according to the complexity of the problem. Each sub-agent resolves its single-hop query by exploring a novel three-layer hierarchical graph of entities, propositions, and passages, using the entity layer for targeted traversal and the proposition layer for high-recall passage retrieval via reciprocal-rank voting. We evaluate GRASP on MuSiQue, 2WikiMultihopQA, and HotpotQA under two settings: open-corpus retrieval and extended context reasoning (LongBench). GRASP achieves the highest QA accuracy in the open retrieval setting on MuSiQue and 2Wiki while using 40-50 percent fewer tokens than IRCoT+HippoRAG2. Furthermore, GRASP leads on EM and F1 across all three datasets in the LongBench setting while using 30 percent fewer tokens than the next most accurate method. Finally, we introduce success economy - the amortized token cost per correct answer, weighted by difficulty - and advocate for efficiency-aware evaluation as a standard practice for agentic QA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
30 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG15 Jan
- 2024GraphReader: Building Graph-based Agent to Enhance Long-Context Abilities of Large Language Models20 Jun
Other references · 28
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
- 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,282
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
16 more
- 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
- 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
- 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 532
- 2023Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 328
- 2023Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphcited by 238
- 2025From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 231
- 2023Knowledge Graph Prompting for Multi-Document Question Answeringcited by 152
- 2024A Human-Inspired Reading Agent with Gist Memory of Very Long Contextscited by 146
- 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 88
- 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
- 2019Understanding Dataset Design Choices for Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 50
- 2025LinearRAG: Linear Graph Retrieval Augmented Generation on Large-scale Corporacited by 49
- 2022PropSegmEnt: A Large-Scale Corpus for Proposition-Level Segmentation and Entailment Recognitioncited by 29
- 2025Efficient Context Selection for Long-Context QA: No Tuning, No Iteration, Just Adaptive-kcited by 21
- 2023Sub-Sentence Encoder: Contrastive Learning of Propositional Semantic Representationscited by 20
- 2024Towards flexible perception with visual memorycited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PRISM: Agentic Retrieval with LLMs for Multi-Hop Question Answering
- 2026Dissecting Agentic RAG: A Component Ablation for Multi-Hop QA with a Local 7B Model
- 2026AgentHop: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Agentic Multi-Hop Scientific Question Answering
- 2026AgenticRAGTracer: A Hop-Aware Benchmark for Diagnosing Multi-Step Retrieval Reasoning in Agentic RAG
- 2026Retrieval--Reasoning Processes for Multi-hop Question Answering: A Four-Axis Design Framework and Empirical Trends
- 2025GraphSearch: An Agentic Deep Searching Workflow for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026Agentic-R: Learning to Retrieve for Agentic Search
- 2025CLAUSE: Agentic Neuro-Symbolic Knowledge Graph Reasoning via Dynamic Learnable Context Engineering