Byzantine-Resilient Federated Learning via QUBO-Based Client Selection on Quantum Annealers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) trains a global model across decentralized clients while preserving data privacy, but at scale it is vulnerable to malicious updates. Byzantine-resilient aggregation methods such as MultiKrum score gradients against their nearest neighbors and can miss malicious updates that preserve the statistical properties of honest ones. We propose a quantum annealing approach that reformulates client selection as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem, encoding pairwise distances into a cost function solved by quantum annealers (QA). Unlike MultiKrum's greedy per-client scoring, the QUBO formulation jointly optimizes over all subsets to find the mutually closest group of m clients. At small scale (15 clients), QUBO outperforms MultiKrum on the most challenging Byzantine attacks: e.g., Advanced LIE is detected with 95.11% accuracy versus 81.33% on MNIST and 97.78% versus 75.56% on CIFAR-10. QUBO fares poorly on simpler attacks where MultiKrum excels, so the two methods are complementary. QUBO quality also degrades as the number of clients grows. To address this, we introduce a MultiSignal ensemble that uses a dual-feature routing gate based on Euclidean and cosine Krum score gaps to classify attacks into four regimes and routes evasion attacks to a suspicion-penalized QUBO with agreement voting. At 100 clients on MNIST, MultiSignal achieves 95.3% average detection accuracy versus 91.8% for classical MultiKrum, with the largest gains on Sparse Lie (72.0% to 95.2%, +23.2 points) and Advanced Lie (80.4% to 85.2%, +4.8 points). These results show that QUBO-based quantum annealing with MultiSignal is a principled and scalable defense against the most challenging Byzantine strategies in federated learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
- 2013Ising formulations of many NP problemscited by 207
- 2018DRACO: Byzantine-resilient Distributed Training via Redundant Gradientscited by 75
- 2022Federated Learning with Quantum Secure Aggregationcited by 21
- 2022Dim-Krum: Backdoor-Resistant Federated Learning for NLP with Dimension-wise Krum-Based Aggregationcited by 8
- 2023Sentinel: An Aggregation Function to Secure Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.