mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-Based Intelligent Notification Composition: From Static Personalization to Context-Aware Persuasive Messaging

arXiv 2605.16264 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2026cs.HC cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Push notifications remain among the most direct channels through which digital platforms engage users, yet existing approaches have invested heavily in who to notify, when to notify, and what to recommend, while leaving how to communicate as the least-optimized stage. This paper argues that message quality is an independent, underinvested lever, and that LLMs create their most differentiated value precisely at this layer. We make three contributions. First, we define notification message quality along six dimensions (contextual relevance, clarity, actionability, novelty handling, linguistic freshness, and persuasive appropriateness) and show how LLM-based composition improves each relative to templates. Across reviewed deployments, reported improvements range from +8% to +14.5% CTR over static templates and +1% to +2.5% over mature slot-filling systems, though these span heterogeneous systems and should not be treated as directly comparable. Second, we provide an architectural attribution analysis disentangling message generation from adjacent components (targeting, ranking, timing), arguing that observed gains are frequently misattributed to text generation alone. Third, we introduce a three-criterion decision framework specifying when LLM generation is and is not the binding constraint. We support these arguments through a PRISMA-guided survey (28 sources from 142 screened), examine domain-specific applications across social media, food delivery, and e-commerce, and propose a unified architectural framework with budget-aware routing, grounded generation, candidate ranking, diversity controls, and online learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 29 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  4. 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
  5. 2024Mix-of-Granularity: Optimize the Chunking Granularity for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 23
  6. 2023A Survey on Causal Inference for Recommendationcited by 22
  7. 2025Benchmarking LLM Faithfulness in RAG with Evolving Leaderboardscited by 19
  8. 2021What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark? Design Attributes, Normative Considerations, and Measurement Methodscited by 15
  9. 2025LLM-Driven E-Commerce Marketing Content Optimization: Balancing Creativity and Conversioncited by 7
  10. 2025PushGen: Push Notifications Generation with LLMcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.