mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AGOP-IxG: A Gradient Covariance Filter for Local Feature Attribution on Tabular Data, with a Controlled Benchmark

arXiv 2605.15700 ↗First posted 15 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated machine learning pipelines increasingly produce models whose predictions must be explained to end users, auditors, and downstream decision systems. The most widely used feature attribution methods (SHAP, Integrated Gradients, LIME) are typically chosen by convention rather than measured fidelity, because rigorous evaluation is impeded by the absence of ground-truth attribution on real data. We propose AGOP-IxG, a fast per-sample attribution method for tabular classifiers that pre-multiplies the per-sample gradient by a top-K rank-truncated Average Gradient Outer Product matrix, and evaluate it against four widely-used baselines on a controlled tabular benchmark designed for AutoML practitioners. In Part 1, we construct three synthetic multi-class tabular tasks (linear, sparse nonlinear, interaction-based) where ground-truth attribution per sample is analytically or numerically derivable, and compare five methods: AGOP-IxG, SHAP (DeepExplainer), Integrated Gradients, InputXGradient, and LIME. AGOP-IxG leads on Spearman rank correlation and noise feature mass on all three synthetic datasets, and on top-k precision on the interaction dataset. Across all settings, AGOP-IxG is approximately 350× to 1,650× faster than SHAP. In Part 2, we evaluate global faithfulness on Adult Income and Credit Card Default using the ROAR protocol; the methods cluster within ~ 1.7% relative AUC, consistent with AGOP-IxG being optimized for per-sample local attribution rather than global feature ranking.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 17 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  7. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  8. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
  9. 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 105
  10. 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
  11. 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
  12. 2022Mechanism of feature learning in deep fully connected networks and kernel machines that recursively learn featurescited by 25
1 more
  1. 2026AGOP as Explanation: From Feature Learning to Per-Sample Attribution in Image Classifierscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.