Capability Conditioned Scaffolding for Professional Human LLM Collaboration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model personalization typically adapts outputs to user preferences and style but does not account for differences in user evaluation capacity across domains of expertise. This limitation can encourage Professional Domain Drift, where users rely on AI generated reasoning in domains they cannot reliably evaluate. We introduce Capability Conditioned Scaffolding, a typed framework that partitions expertise into strong, mixed, and weak domains and conditions intervention behavior on structured capability profiles. A pilot evaluation across multiple MMLU subsets and four LLM substrates shows consistent profile conditioned intervention behavior, including categorical inversion under profile swapping and selective activation in mixed domain risk zones. These findings suggest that capability aware scaffolding can support more reliable professional human AI collaboration beyond stylistic personalization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
8 of 14 references.
References · 8
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
- 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 100
- 2021The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithmscited by 44
Built on by
Not cited yet.